In whatever language it may be, there are people who constantly try to negate any and all of your propositions, statements, logic etc all the time! It’s really annoying. They are like the trolls of social media came alive.
It looks to me as though Woodstock’s second “word” in the third panel isn’t the same as in the first, unless the period under the exclamation mark is missing in panel three, though the next-to-last “scratch” isn’t tilted as much as in the first panel. So useful, my degree in Forensic Philology.
su43dipta about 5 years ago
In whatever language it may be, there are people who constantly try to negate any and all of your propositions, statements, logic etc all the time! It’s really annoying. They are like the trolls of social media came alive.
Grammar.Consulting about 5 years ago
It looks to me as though Woodstock’s second “word” in the third panel isn’t the same as in the first, unless the period under the exclamation mark is missing in panel three, though the next-to-last “scratch” isn’t tilted as much as in the first panel. So useful, my degree in Forensic Philology.
Troglodyte about 5 years ago
Try in French, Snoops.
jagedlo about 5 years ago
ask him to back it up with facts?
uniquename about 5 years ago
You don’t. You go talk to someone who’s rational.
Ellis97 about 5 years ago
How can you talk to someone who only speaks in his thoughts.
The Reader Premium Member about 5 years ago
Au contraire.
e.groves about 5 years ago
That’s funny.
jpayne4040 about 5 years ago
Look at Woodstock getting sophisticated!
Mediatech about 5 years ago
Is he a European sparrow?
WCraft Premium Member about 5 years ago
Have a friend that way (he is a modern Sheldon Cooper). Favorite response was: “Not Necessarily”
hagarthehorrible about 5 years ago
Conversations do take detours Snoopy! The secretary has his own take.