Recent Comments

1. 9 days ago on Doonesbury

   Ditto Trump.

2. 9 days ago on Prickly City

   Check Scott’s political cartoon today. My reaction to it: “It’s about time!” And nobody really cares about Bill or Hilary.

3. 12 days ago on Prickly City

   That was a result of a law passed by Congress back in 1929, not a constitutional change, which was a time when the rural and urban populations were roughly equivalent. That law needs to go or be amended.

4. 18 days ago on Prickly City

   Saw an spot just a few minutes ago that the Rs in Nebraska want to do away with the apportionment law – right before the election of course.

5. 25 days ago on Prickly City

   Glad you mentioned the Putin connection to Stein. Too many don’t know about it.

6. 25 days ago on Prickly City

   I had looked up the stats a few weeks ago. The answer is no. Nixon’s EC vote was too high – 301. Add the states that Wallace won (all deep south) 46 EC to Humphrey (191 EC) and it still wouldn’t have beaten Nixon’s EC edge. But it is likely that giving those states’ votes to Humphrey would have given him the popular vote – they were almost even in the popular vote numbers. So Nixon would have won anyway. The one thing that might have happened would be the screaming about the EC led to the votes in Congress to get rid of the EC, or at least do massive reforms to it.

7. 3 months ago on Prickly City

   I’m a year old (in October) and agree. Though White Chocolate Raspberry Truffle is moving up.

8. 3 months ago on Joey Weatherford

   You clearly have never seen a Trump speech or rally.

9. 3 months ago on Clay Jones

   He’ll flunk the drug test.

10. 3 months ago on Clay Bennett

    I guess you weren’t around in 1968 and 1972. Both conventions were disasters because Ds didn’t unite before the convention. And we got Nixon because of the D infighting.