Recent Comments

1. over 15 years ago on Non Sequitur

   This goes quite against nature - he’s reading the instructions!! (After he’s botched the job, of course).

2. over 15 years ago on Non Sequitur

   Hi Runar, glad you put me right. I don’t think my physics teacher mentioned the Klingons, though. Are they quarks?

3. over 15 years ago on Non Sequitur

   From what I remember from physics class, a quantum is the smallest possible movement that can be made to make a difference (like a neutron moving from one ‘shell’ to another). I think. Obviously, willing to be proved wrong.

4. over 15 years ago on Non Sequitur

   Scientists should not concern themselves with the ‘why’, and creationists should not concern themselves with the ‘how’.

   That’s where all the trouble springs from … though it does make for great blogs!

5. almost 16 years ago on Doonesbury

   Yep, definitely 5-26. Of course over here (in Australia) we’d write 26.5.

6. almost 16 years ago on Non Sequitur

   Oh, Grazer, NASA couldn’t possibly have said that - for one thing they spelt definitely wrong!

7. almost 16 years ago on Doonesbury

   Hi Okeedoekee - no, GW’s more likely to tell the French they don’t have a word for entrepreneur.

8. almost 16 years ago on Non Sequitur

   Economists - like to work out in theory what they see happening in practice.

9. almost 16 years ago on Doonesbury

   Only one? Aaaw, he’s just so modest!

10. almost 16 years ago on Non Sequitur

    ArthurAllen, you’re so right!! A lesson to be learned in the workforce, too - if you’re going to take the credit for someone else’s work, make sure it gets praised first, then tell everyone you did it.