Avatar alberto

albertonencioni Free

Recent Comments

  1. 2 days ago on For Better or For Worse

    Yup. Bark, woof! :-D

  2. 3 days ago on Doonesbury

    Your mastership of the “English Dictionary of Insults” is admirable. The meaning of your post, however, is not so clear.

  3. 3 days ago on For Better or For Worse

    They will live… how much? 4, 6, 8 years? and that’s all, no more puppies, fullstop. How much will they eat? how many damages and attack will they do? Drug addicts and robbers in S.Francisco and Los Angeles are far worse, but nobody even thinks to PREACH them.

  4. 3 days ago on For Better or For Worse

    I felt the same at 15, but luckily my parents did not love me enough to “neuter” me.

  5. 3 days ago on For Better or For Worse

    You sterilize animals that ARE NOT in the streets and will probably never be. The “in their interest” yadda yadda is only to cover the hundred dollars fees cashed in by vet clinics. There ARE volunteers that go out for feral animals, sterilize and releases them back in their environment, and they do it for free – deep respect for their work and I am happy to contribute. Otherwise is only in the owner’s interest for a quieter life – why not “fixing” teenagers sons and daughters, they produce unwanted puppies too.

  6. 5 days ago on Bloom County

    “Asphalt me like there is no tomorrow”

  7. 5 days ago on For Better or For Worse

    May be. But if a Westie attacks you the outcome is generally more favourable.

  8. 6 days ago on For Better or For Worse

    Dogs are innocent and trustful creatures. A dog could never imagine that his master will evirate him only for enjoying better siestas.

  9. 8 days ago on For Better or For Worse

    I am not objecting to the operation “in se” (although with the same argumentations you should “fix” many humans too): I don’t like the “vanilla naming”. You are not fixing something that is not fixed in the animal: you are fixing YOUR problem, and should call things with their names, unpleasing or splatter as they may be.“All you need to say is simply ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ anything beyond this comes from the evil one.” (Matthew, 5:37)

  10. 8 days ago on For Better or For Worse

    I am not objecting to the operation “in se” (although with the same argumentations you should “fix” many humans too): I don’t like the “vanilla naming”. You are not fixing something that is not fixed in the animal: you are fixing YOUR problem, and should call things with their names, unpleasing or splatter as they may be.“All you need to say is simply ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ anything beyond this comes from the evil one.” (Matthew, 5:37)