I do not believe she is implying that at all. I think I was clear in what I believe to be the interpretation of the cartoon in question. You appeared to interpret that she was advocating a bail for the oil industry jobs, and I disagreed.
Wow… one comment, and I was cordial. I didn’t call you names. Didn’t imply you were unintelligent. Simply stated my point. Yet you cannot refrain from name calling. Well played.
How about “You absolutely love to see it.” That sounds celebratory to me. I’m just saying, let’s be fair. It happened. She said it. Then she deleted it, like that makes it go away. I agree the federalist is the fist one that shows up, but dig a little deeper. The story is there.
I believe, that in the context of this cartoon, she is merely pointing out that a specific Democrat congresswoman was openly celebrating the loss of jobs within the oil industry. This is factual. Again, within the context of this cartoon, I do not see where she is advocating for a bail out of said jobs.
I believe, that in the context of this cartoon, she is merely pointing out that a specific Democrat congresswoman was openly celebrating the loss of jobs within the oil industry. This is factual. Again, within the context of this cartoon, I do not see where she is advocating for a bail out of said jobs.
right… because anyone who disagrees with you must be a troll. Got it.