Recent Comments

1. about 8 years ago on Ted Rall

   This isn’t equivalence (true of false) – it’s a meaningful comparison, based on the available evidence. It also doesn’t mean that Trump wouldn’t be a terrible President; it just means that Clinton will probably also be pretty awful.

2. about 8 years ago on The LeftyBosco Picture Show

   Beautiful water-color work!

3. over 8 years ago on F Minus

   Completely incomprehensible.

4. almost 9 years ago on New Adventures of Queen Victoria

   R.I.P., Messrs. Rickman and Bowie!

   It’s only January! Who’s next? Grim…

5. over 9 years ago on Ted Rall

   Thanks, ted for the concise statement of the situation. Excellent work (as usual)!

6. almost 11 years ago on La Cucaracha

   I couldn’t have said it better, myself…

   Thank You Very Much.

7. almost 12 years ago on Candorville

   Ah, Facebook – the sixth sign of the Apocalypse… The Devil would be so proud.

8. almost 12 years ago on Views of the World

   Hear, Hear!

9. almost 12 years ago on Candorville

   Amusing, but simplistic and essentially wrong. Don’t get me wrong, I think that Darrin Bell’s work is outstanding, but he’s created a straw man, here.

   The fact that people have an innate tendency to dislike that which is new, says nothing at all about whether or not our entertainment is or is not being degraded. The fact that our air, water, and land are all, in fact, being degraded might be seen as an indication that the present isn’t actually the same as the past.

   Just sayin’…

10. about 12 years ago on Endtown

    Hear, hear.