Missing large

johnschutt Free

Comics I Follow

For Better or For Worse

For Better or For Worse

By Lynn Johnston
Peanuts

Peanuts

By Charles Schulz
Rubes

Rubes

By Leigh Rubin
Shoe

Shoe

By Gary Brookins and Susie MacNelly
Frazz

Frazz

By Jef Mallett
The Argyle Sweater

The Argyle Sweater

By Scott Hilburn
Non Sequitur

Non Sequitur

By Wiley Miller
Calvin and Hobbes

Calvin and Hobbes

By Bill Watterson
Bloom County

Bloom County

By Berkeley Breathed
Pearls Before Swine

Pearls Before Swine

By Stephan Pastis
Cul de Sac

Cul de Sac

By Richard Thompson
Doonesbury

Doonesbury

By Garry Trudeau

Recent Comments

  1. 9 days ago on Shoe

    Bad taste.

  2. 11 days ago on Non Sequitur

    Dear reader, With Richard, you see someone who is so dedicated to his worldview of philosophical naturalism that he even denies science. For millennia, scientists thought that the universe was eternal past. Then Einstein’s relative equations implied that it had a beginning. He didn’t like this result, and put in his famous “fudge factor” to make the equations work this way. He later regretted this decision and concluded that the universe was not past eternal but finite with a beginning. Experimental evidence from Hubble and others verified this conclusion. So cosmology has known for over one hundred years that the universe had a beginning. Naturalists like Richard S. Russel conclude a priori that God cannnot exist and refuse to look at the arguments. But the whole point of the big bang is that it is when all time and matter and energy and everything came into existence. In spite of Richard’s “Science of the Gaps,” there was NO THING before the big bang. That’s the science.

  3. 12 days ago on Non Sequitur

    Hey, Richard. There was NO THING before the big bang. No imagination. Just science.

    There are two types of causes, event causation and agent causation. Science shows that there was no thing before the big bang, therefore eliminating event causation. There is only one other logical alternative.

  4. 13 days ago on Non Sequitur

    “You can’t have a Big Bang without something to “bang.”" There was NO THING before the big bang. No matter. No energy. No time. No thing.

    As for multiple bangs, it could not happen. If the universe was eternally old, then all energy would have dissipated by now. The universe would have reached thermal equilibrium.

    In addition, there are the philosophical issues of it being impossible to have an actual infinite and the impossibility of reaching “today” through an infinite number of finite times.

  5. 13 days ago on Non Sequitur

    “Going on… before…” both require time. Richard, the big bang was the beginning of time. There was no time before it. There was no matter. There was NO THING.

  6. 14 days ago on Non Sequitur

    It’s funny how you guys deny science.

  7. 14 days ago on Non Sequitur

    It’s funny how you guys deny science.

  8. 15 days ago on Non Sequitur

    So, this denies the fact that there was NO THING before the big bang. It’s anti-science.

  9. 23 days ago on Frazz

    Our souls are subject to time after we die. We are eternal.

  10. 30 days ago on Rubes

    Except for the One who appeared on earth.