Recent Comments

1. 23 days ago on Baby Blues

   I was thinking it was for “propulsion!”

2. 24 days ago on Bliss

   Ever notice how the Beaver gives Rabbit and Christopher Robin his card, “because he’s not in the book.” Which is a joke that won’t make sense to children anymore because they have never seen a Phonebook! So sad, and it’s such a good joke.

3. about 1 month ago on Baby Blues

   I’m surprised no one has mentioned the Forrest Gump scene in which he shows President Johnson the scar on his gluteus maximus by dropping his pants on TV!

4. about 1 month ago on Bliss

   Must have been a squirrel.

5. 3 months ago on Bliss

   I was thinking the answer is “Duh! Of course it is!”

6. 6 months ago on Non Sequitur

   I was just going to note that the Gen-X / Millenial kid looking at his phone was about to collide with the businessman.

7. 6 months ago on Bliss

   Not unless she was thinking the same thing…

8. 12 months ago on Non Sequitur

   @Concretionist I’m also a big fan of the Bob and Nikki series. Even if it is really quite silly!

9. about 1 year ago on B.C.

   Semantics are tricky. Sentences that look symmetric aren’t always as symmetric semantically as they are syntactically. For example: “Ski slopes are full of girls looking for husbands, and husbands looking for girls.”

10. over 1 year ago on Heart of the City

    Duh! It came from the Heart!