Recent Comments

1. 2 days ago on Non Sequitur

   There are so many possible alternatives to the final panel.

   “Political promises are worthless. Look towards their history.”

   “Estimates are only estimates, not guaranteed promises.”

   “Businesses are about making money. Even if the business is promising to make you rich, they’re relying on you paying them your money to become rich.”

2. 6 days ago on Non Sequitur

   It’s odd how often those who make walking in the great outdoors rather precarious, are also the ones who refer to it as “the great outdoors”. That said, stepping on someone else’s landmine does lead to uttering a variant of “oh, great”.

3. 19 days ago on Non Sequitur

   First thing I thought upon seeing that cartoon is that it’s mosquito season around here. Exposing yourself to nature is one thing. Exposing that much though, including the most sensitive parts? Not so much.

4. about 1 month ago on Non Sequitur

   Black people in the US tend to be more quickly viewed and treated as criminals, and the police routinely are far more eager to use force, including deadly force in areas where white people don’t see the same treatment. That bias has been seen in multiple major police departments across the US.

5. about 1 month ago on Non Sequitur

   Depends on the location of the bar. From what I’ve heard, either side can be extremely safe in the proper specific parts of the US.

6. about 1 month ago on Non Sequitur

   I’m envious of how Britain handles their elections. It’s set for within a specific number of weeks, and at a small fraction of America’s campaign spending.

7. about 1 month ago on Non Sequitur

   Agreed. One promised to indict Hillary Clinton when campaigning for the 2016 election, and has been arguing for the legal prosecution of the disproven 2020 election fraud. This is while consistently pressuring his political party to indict the current president with fictitious crimes, while simultaneously arguing for the complete abandonment of criminal responsibility for presidents.

   Of course, that’s not at all related to members of the public deciding whether to indict on existing facts of the case, before going to court where that evidence is presented, with both parties being allowed to argue for and against the facts of the case. Prosecution at the direction of the government and in the absence of facts is not, has not, and should not be how criminal cases are run in any country with a democracy. And that is not what we see in US courts today.

8. about 1 month ago on Non Sequitur

   You can’t sentence the already dead.

9. about 1 month ago on Non Sequitur

   He left the rat race, only to find the loser as his dinner.

10. about 2 months ago on Non Sequitur

    In other words, you don’t know what it is, so you know what it is. Left handedness and epileptic seizures were proof of Satan. Hurricanes and tornadoes were proof of god’s wrath. Droughts were proof of god’s absence, and lightning was proof of Thor. Whenever something has been proven to have previously been believed as coming from or through a god, that god has yet to be proven to be the answer.

    Also, I’ve already clarified that what’s known is “the big bang” was a quick and massive expansion of what already existed, so didn’t need to come from anywhere. The argument of “nothing is infinite, and nothing can come from nothing” is often used to back the belief that a god is infinite, and created everything from nothing. Until gods can be proven to exist through science, gods are not a part of science, just like science based entirely on faith isn’t science.