What’s next? Putting Jimmy Carter up there? If Carter II, why not Carter I?
Since when do we honor “Below Average” presidents? Both devastated the economy with their liberal tax and spend programs. And before you liberals blame Bush, remember that Obama was in the Senate for 4 years and supported Bush’s reckless spending.
My comment was directed to another one of Eryx’s nonsensical rants. I guess he realized the error of his ways and deleted his post, leaving my comment first.
First, both Republicans and Democrats district shop. Targeting West is more liberal rhetoric.
Second, there is a technical distinction between district shopping and gerrymandering. However, both are based on the same principal — trying to stack the deck to win an election. Again, both parties are equally culpable.
Are you suggesting that there is a meaningful distinction between “district-shopping” and gerrymandering? Or as one of my professors used to say, “Same thing, only different.” Of course, when the liberals do it, no problem.
To simplify things for you, a professor is someone who teaches college courses.
No, the American public, with a big assist from the media, slipped and pushed him into the Oval Office. In November, we will put him in a lifeboat and let him drift out to sea.
What’s next? Putting Jimmy Carter up there? If Carter II, why not Carter I?
Since when do we honor “Below Average” presidents? Both devastated the economy with their liberal tax and spend programs. And before you liberals blame Bush, remember that Obama was in the Senate for 4 years and supported Bush’s reckless spending.