I’m thinking that one is merely a second account of the first as indicated by the same persona of both. That allows for some of that hillbilly self-love, too.
Yes, it is easy to see when someone is willing to come to outlandish and unfounded conclusions based only on what they imagine to exist. And thus, conversing with them is the perfect exercise in futility, as whatever opinions they present will, more than likely, have no basis in fact. I hope that helps.
“The only reason you have such a low opinion of them is that they disagree with you and you are under the mistaken belief that you are the smartest person in the world.”
Well, at least you are consistent with your willingness to be presumptuous. So, I will assume that continuing this back and forth would be futile. Over and out.
Well, from my perspective it is very easy to group all or most into one category and then make a false claim regarding that category’s characteristics. That is in opposition to actually doing some mental legwork to determine who is and who isn’t attempting to spread propaganda based on their own agenda. Or, in other words, over-generalizations are lazy thinking.
P.S. Most of all the “man-on-the-street” interviews I have watched, by which ever personality, do not show the interviewee as having the mental aptitude of a Gore Vidal or a William F. Buckley, nor anything close to it.
“No the soros controlled demoRATS didn’t get enough dead people to vote’
Here’s a fun one jd, pull out your favorite search engine and stick this phrase in the search bar, “republicans caught voting for their dead relatives”.
Here’s the first four I found doing just that:
Another GOP voter caught casting a ballot for a dead relative
Man admits to voter fraud in casting dead mother’s ballot
Another voter fraud accusation blows up in Republicans’ …
6 Accused of Forging Dead People’s Signatures to Get …
So, once again projection is the republican goto. (jd, projection is when you accuse others of what you (or your side) are doing.)
“I’m sure lots of nice votes got turned into naughty votes "
I have believed that one of the reasons for all the “crying wolf” about the 2016 election (before the results came in) and the 2020 election was to make us numb to any claims that would be attempted after this past election—where, in all likelihood, in those outlying areas—emphasis on the “lying”, shenanigans occurred.
However, just as likely, is that far too many voters fell for the non-stop advertisements full of misinformation and blame game tactics that had no real basis in fact. While on the other side, her only mistake was thinking that playing nice would work.
I’m thinking that one is merely a second account of the first as indicated by the same persona of both. That allows for some of that hillbilly self-love, too.