If the cartoonist was “balanced”, tomorrow would be “When conservatives get trapped, we escape by blaming it all on liberals.”
But then there would have to be a series where all political paths were trodden and their failings brought to light…. It would be a never ending series. Too much material for all parties and perspectives to be concisely condensed into a three panel perspective.
If Washington DC had a “stand your ground” rules, it could be argued that politicians could be targets if they were voting for/against legislation that a person could construe their position as a “reasonable belief of a threat”.I’m not implying that argument would withstand judicial scrutiny, but consider the misfortunate incident in Florida…
If the cartoonist was “balanced”, tomorrow would be “When conservatives get trapped, we escape by blaming it all on liberals.”
But then there would have to be a series where all political paths were trodden and their failings brought to light…. It would be a never ending series. Too much material for all parties and perspectives to be concisely condensed into a three panel perspective.