Iroh

jim_pem Free

World-travelling country boy from the Appalachian foothills. I'm as comfortable digging ditches as I am rubbing elbows with foreign diplomats. Both can be satisfying and both can get you dirty, all at the same time.

Recent Comments

  1. 2 days ago on Dick Tracy

    I don’t know about that. You sound knowledgeable in police work. My contact point has been jury duty and studying body language in interrogations. I was on a jury a couple of years ago, for example, where it sems the Sheriff’s Department didn’t do the work necessary to convict the guy. There was a pistol outside the accused’s alleged car. First, they couldn’t prove the accused was in the car. Second, they didn’t even fingerprint the firearm. If they could have found the accused’s fingerprints on the firearm, they would have had a case. It seems easy enough. Without linking the weapon beyond a reasonable doubt to the accused, we couldn’t convict. The process work was what was needed, but the high-speed chase and finding him in bed “sleeping” (and sweaty, and out of breath) when he hadn’t been observed fleeing from the vehicle was also needed to establish some evidence that he could have been driving during the chase. So the action happens, but forensics are often necessary in real police work.

  2. 2 days ago on Dick Tracy

    That’s the breast saga I’ve ever heard.

  3. 2 days ago on Dick Tracy

    You forgot Dr McCracken’s associate: Dr. Ben Dover.

  4. 2 days ago on Dick Tracy

    It looks like we’re sniffing the same cold trail, but I guess I should ask at what point clues become evidence. Can clues that might or might not be evidence of an unknown crime be admitted into evidence? It’s a clue, but a clue of what?

    I know that real police work can involve some ambiguity as criminals will try to hide their criminal activities. It’s often an art of making a case using informal logic if a confession can’t be obtained. That is, it’s affirming the consequent with a reasonable likelihood. The story is written in a quasi-omniscient voice. We (mostly) know everything that’s going on. This is common for mysteries. What we don’t have is a whodunit (maybe). What we have is more of a whatsgoingon to the point that we doubt the author knows what’s going on.

  5. 2 days ago on Dick Tracy

    Having dumb crooks is the only way Eric has in order to make Tracy and the MCU look good since he can’t make them strong enough crime fighters on their own.

  6. 2 days ago on Dick Tracy

    “Fill up my cavity”

    Two of my favorite dentists are Puller Mall and Bill M. N. Howe.

  7. 2 days ago on Dick Tracy

    Put the clues together – to discover exactly what? I don’t think we have a bead on the crime ourselves. It was the case of the bumbling body snatchers. Then there may be a murder associated with the body. Was Sarge killed or was it Horace? Is the body supposed to be done up by the crooks to look like Horace? Why try to steal it? Are they investigating whether it was a murder? Are they investigating the attempted body snatching? Do they know exactly what they are investigating?

  8. 4 days ago on F Minus

    “You’re both wrong!”

    Contrarianism for the sake of casting an aura of wisdom falsely is a thing.

  9. 4 days ago on Dick Tracy

    “IF THOSE BUMBLING IDIOT NEPHEWS OF MINE HADN’T FOULED UP STEALING THIS BODY, I WOULDN’T HAVE HAD TO COME DOWN HERE AND IDENTIFY IT! YEAH! THAT’S MY LOUSY HUSBAND! GIVE ME HIS LIFE INSURANCE CHECK ALREADY! CAN’T YOU SEE I’M IN MOURNING?!”

  10. 5 days ago on Dick Tracy

    Blaze must be fattening.