Two things – you don’t have to verify it, the Los Vegas Police Dept. did that. And killing 58 people and wounding 413 in 11 minutes should give you an indication of how much fire power a bump stock gave him.
Mr. Ramirez is pointing out the absurdity of the Supreme Court and your argument. He’s saying it by pointing out two facts – the court’s ruling (a fact) and that 58 people were killed and hundreds wounded in 11 minutes (over 1000 shots fired) by someone using a device that makes an AR-15 an automatic weapon (but not technically).
Mr. Lester – In fact, many American families do struggle with addiction. The list your barfly makes is intended to be sarcastic, but it’s not far from the truth.
The laptop was a prop. The evidence used was from his iCloud account(which backed up his computer), on his iPhone, in bank statements and from his own mouth.
Not really. The crime he was convicted of were gun charges and lying on a federal document. None of those charges were verified by that laptop, just the fact he used drugs at the time he claimed he wasn’t using. the thing that dammed him in the eyes of the jury was that he wrote about it in his memoirs.
Two things – you don’t have to verify it, the Los Vegas Police Dept. did that. And killing 58 people and wounding 413 in 11 minutes should give you an indication of how much fire power a bump stock gave him.