“Signed affidavits” are not evidence unless the affiant is present in court, under oath, and subject to cross examination.
The fact of the matter is that NONE of 45/03’s attorneys alleged EVEN ONE specific instance of fraud in ANY of the dozens of lawsuits that sought to overturn the election.
To the contrary, Rudy Giuliani denied on the record in open court that fraud was even a cause of action at all.
Did the last guy hire utterly incompetent counsel, or is it possible that their understanding of the rules of evidence runs far deeper than your own?
Did the cartoon make any reference to political party?
Must’ve been wicked subtle…