Recent Comments

1. 5 months ago on B.C.

   I live in rural Chesapeake VA, and have an approved rifle range on the property.

   A subdivision opened up nearby, and filled with people fleeing Norfolk. Now, every time I go out to shoot, they call the police.

   City people can’t mind their own business and they can’t be allowed unrestricted control of rural areas.

2. 5 months ago on B.C.

   Absent the Electoral College, 5 metropolitan areas would choose the President, the rest of the country would have no say in who was President. People living in cities would dictate every aspect of country life.

3. about 1 year ago on Pearls Before Swine

   No one is trying to ban books for adults. Some books, however, are not appropriate for younger children, and thus should not be in elementary school libraries. If parents want their children to have them, Amazon will oblige.

4. about 1 year ago on Doonesbury

   Life Magazine did that 30 years ago. Recently aborted, but still living 12 week fetuses responded to a probe touching the eye by flinching, a reflex. But at 16 weeks the hand pushed the probe away, a coordinated response.

   Not rocket science, but definitely a self-aware response to pain.

   At 20 weeks, ultrasounds show thumb sucking, which also requires body awareness.

5. about 1 year ago on Doonesbury

   I am not religious at all, but I do believe the baby deserves protection after rudimentary self awareness can be demonstrated, about 16 weeks. Cogito ergo sum

   Self-defense still applies, but a serious threat to life should be required.

   No religion, just rational ethics.

6. about 1 year ago on Doonesbury

   “Allowed” may not have been the best choice of words.

   I haven’t seen the religious influence you worry about, though I do remember Scalia making some inconsistent decisions due to his hatred of drugs.

7. about 1 year ago on Doonesbury

   Of course not, it contains the means to amend it and Congress can make appropriate law within its limits. There are plenty of remedies other than judicial tyranny.

8. about 1 year ago on Doonesbury

   SCOTUS is not allowed to consider the outcome of adhering to the Constitution and the laws as written. They only interpret the laws to reflect the will of the Congress that passed them. If you don’t like the outcomes, address them in Congress. If you think SCOTUS should be guided by their personal opinion of what is wise, you need remedial civics.

9. over 1 year ago on Doonesbury

   The vaccines do not prevent you from being infected, nor do they prevent you from passing it on to others. What they do is to help you not die. Particularly if you are elderly or immune compromised.

10. over 1 year ago on Non Sequitur

    Note that I didn’t say “states”, I said “urban areas.” Rural parts of CA and NY have more in common with Wyoming than their cities. But in a popular vote contest, the votes of people in rural areas and small towns hove no voice. The Electoral College gives them that voice. I really don’t want people who live in apartments telling me how to raise my chickens or how I can fish and hunt.