Recent Comments

1. about 22 hours ago on Non Sequitur

   at this point in our history, the “both sides argument” is obviously and wildly inaccurate

2. about 22 hours ago on Non Sequitur

   what name has Harris or Waltz called the other side that couldn’t more reasonably be called accurately descriptive as opposed to simply the “juvenile name-calling” we get from Trump and his sycophants?

3. 7 days ago on Non Sequitur

   Fox was the one with the “Fair and Balanced” tag line and also the one that lost in court, forced to pay hundreds of millions of dollars in damages and had to admit they are not news that anyone would take seriously, but entertainment. Given that, your comment makes as much sense as those from your friend chaosed2, which is none.

4. 7 days ago on Non Sequitur

   except the opposite is true, as you said: “The reality is the left has a near monopoly on the MSM and has leveraged this to effectively brainwash people, some to such an extent that they will willingly reject the evidence of their own eyes and ears in favor of what Big Brother….errr, Cable and Network news tells them is true.”

   I’m tired of your lies. I won’t read anymore from you because it is a waste of time.

5. 8 days ago on Non Sequitur

   you still offer nothing to support your assertions. Absolutely nothing. You flunked speech and debate in high school, didn’t you?

6. 10 days ago on Non Sequitur

   you offer nothing to support your assertions—or viewpoint as you call it. No evidence. No logic. Just tired talking points that we’ve been hearing on Fox News for years.

7. 10 days ago on Non Sequitur

   I realize you believe the opposite, even though you have zero evidence or logic to support your position. You probably also believe that back in the day Fox News was “fair and balanced” because they told you to believe that.

8. 11 days ago on Non Sequitur

   If you believe corporate media has a liberal bias instead of a corporate one that happens to align perfectly with Republicans (i.e., fewer taxes, less regulation, and weaker worker protections), there’s not much use talking to you.

   Also, we’ve been exposed to enough “alternative facts” from the GOP and their sycophants, as well as observing your devotion to a known pathological liar and a likely fascist, to identify which side cannot be trusted on anything at all.

9. 12 days ago on Non Sequitur

   or using Occam’s Razor, the simplest explanation is that Republicans lie with such regularity you can’t believe anything they say

10. 13 days ago on Non Sequitur

    You mean to tell me that people did not believe, based on the strength of their word, those who are the embodiment of the little boy who cried wolf? It’s interesting that you imply that situation says something negative about the left as opposed to the right… interesting given the right’s history of employing “alternative facts”