Recent Comments

1. about 1 year ago on Doonesbury

   Yes, diabolical, socialist fiends they are (NDP that is). :)

2. about 1 year ago on Doonesbury

   Except that the NDP is hardly a “fringe” party. Many Canadians support their policies (most recently for dental coverage).

3. over 1 year ago on Doonesbury

   Yeah, for software that old I guess it’s excusable. But, one would have hoped that the issue would have been recognized long before Y 2000 arrived to avoid all the panic/gloom/doom.

   I guess I can say that without blushing too much because software I wrote in the 1980s took that into account (which was pretty gratifying when Y 2000 loomed as I was able to report that we would require no time or resources to fix the problem).

4. over 1 year ago on Doonesbury

   Yeah, that’s what I should have said. Year 2000 was a leap year (which fooled a lot of software that did not take the 400 divisibility rule into account).

5. over 1 year ago on Doonesbury

   And to add that two digit years would also be a big problem.

6. over 1 year ago on Doonesbury

   Good on ’em but, if those programmers had programmed properly to begin with they would have taken into account that Y2K was not a leap year.

7. over 1 year ago on Doonesbury

   “Embeds” with an all female…..? Sounds like a great gig (if taken literally).

8. over 1 year ago on Doonesbury

   How does that saying go again? Fools and their money parting ways or some-such….

9. about 2 years ago on Doonesbury

   Heh, sounds like something I would have tried (back in the olden days that is).

10. over 2 years ago on Doonesbury

    Row well and live.