Recent Comments

1. about 9 hours ago on Michael Ramirez

   The Firearms Act of 1934 [?]. Machine guns had been around for about 60 years at that time and semiautomatic rifles for 30 years or less. Bump stocks were unheard of. I would consider the descriptions in the Act not inclusive of new technology since the range in rate of fire of bump stock rifles overlaps with the rate of fire range of fully automatic rifles. Typical of right-wing justices of the SCOTUS to use out dated information to make decisions.

2. about 10 hours ago on Jack Ohman

   They are all small by their own volition. This attribute makes it easier for them to kiss the flamin’ fanny. Most mirrors are too high for them to see how disgusting they have become.

3. about 10 hours ago on Mike Beckom

   You seem to be ridiculing people for taking the time to be on this site, yet here you are.

4. about 11 hours ago on Joe Heller

   Some of you have accurately indicated that the relationship of atmospheric CO2 conc. and global warming was considered fairly early in the Industrial Revolution. My question is when and where did the active denial of this start occurring?

5. about 11 hours ago on Bob Gorrell

   And Trump is selling tax cuts and excess deregulation to the Fat Cats for their money. I can predict that all of this will increase the National Debt bigly and will eventually result in an economic crisis. Trump totally screwed up the pandemic crisis management so why would you think he could handle any type of crisis? He is more likely to cause one than effectively manage one.

6. about 11 hours ago on Bill Bramhall

   Thomas’ ignorance was showing in his opinion on bump stocks. The Justices should have convened at a range to actually see how these things work and how close to fully automatic these things resemble. I wonder if even that would have changed their decision.

7. about 11 hours ago on Al Goodwyn Editorial Cartoons

   Attaboy, you’re wrong. If you went to the trouble to fact check, you would find that Dangerguy has the facts. I have no idea what you have, but it’s not facts.

8. 3 days ago on Al Goodwyn Editorial Cartoons

   “I would be willing to bet his IQ is more than double what yours [ @IT Sauzeech ]is!” …. Take the bet IT, take the bet! There is no way you can lose that bet.

9. 3 days ago on Lisa Benson

   This reminds me of the Indian parable of the Blind Men and the Elephant. Each felt a different part of the elephant so each had a different concept of what the elephant looked like. Unless you see the entire context the risk is high to misconstrue especially if your looking for some validation of a preconceived notion.

10. 3 days ago on Chris Britt

    I saw a segment on 60 minutes where a bullet was fired into a block of agar with the density of human tissue. They fired 9mm pistol and 5.56 AR15. The difference was stunning. The amount of destruction by the AR15 round was vast. I don’t see how anyone hit by one of these ever completely recovers unless they are lucky.