It’s pretty racist, when you assume ANYone not white is a “diversity hire.” As I said, back of the bus, only menial jobs for you (unless, of course, you kiss Trump’s keister and deny racist things THAT HAVE HAPPENED EVEN TO YOU).
The poster is referring to Cannon’s (and Uncle Clarence’s) assertion that decades of precedent allowing this kind of prosecutor is unconstitutional, even though they themselves used it on Hunter. This will most likely get reversed on appeal unless Trump pencil-whips it.
Instead of going to Washington to “fight,” it might be better to go there to peacefully advocate for one’s position. It is the right that use the “fight” rhetoric at every turn.
Now that SCOTUS has abandoned stare decisis, all bets are off. And all three Trump appointees promised to honor it, then ditched it at the soonest opportunity. And IF there ever is another Democratic President (I think the only way that kind of immunity was granted was the assumption that the Democrats are finished) it could be used to overturn precedents the other side likes.
It’s pretty racist, when you assume ANYone not white is a “diversity hire.” As I said, back of the bus, only menial jobs for you (unless, of course, you kiss Trump’s keister and deny racist things THAT HAVE HAPPENED EVEN TO YOU).