Actually, this is the reason, when I send a “text” message (I guess, in opposition to a “numerical” message), I always spell out my messages, completely! In my own mind, the messages I transmit are altogether too important to risk having them misconstrued. (And, yes, I DO recognize that I may be the only one in existence who feels that ANYTHING I “text” is sufficiently interesting to bother ‘misconstruing’ – or even reading!) (so pffffffft)
I’m rather like Sarah Elizabeth Huckabee Sanders in one respect. She performs, at the Press Secretary’s podium for an audience of “One” – the president! My “texts” likewise need only satisfy only one person; that person is me!
Templo S.U.D. over 6 years ago
Doesn’t anyone use “thx” instead when expressing graditude? I’ve seen it at times.
Cameron1988 Premium Member over 6 years ago
Even I figured out what it meant when I saw it in the first panel
TejanoViejo] over 6 years ago
DUH !!! . . .
micromos over 6 years ago
I thought it was an anotomical reference.
oakie817 over 6 years ago
I always say and text “ty tyvm”
locake over 6 years ago
I’ve never seen two TY’s. One TY is enough.
wellis1947 Premium Member over 6 years ago
Actually, this is the reason, when I send a “text” message (I guess, in opposition to a “numerical” message), I always spell out my messages, completely! In my own mind, the messages I transmit are altogether too important to risk having them misconstrued. (And, yes, I DO recognize that I may be the only one in existence who feels that ANYTHING I “text” is sufficiently interesting to bother ‘misconstruing’ – or even reading!) (so pffffffft)
I’m rather like Sarah Elizabeth Huckabee Sanders in one respect. She performs, at the Press Secretary’s podium for an audience of “One” – the president! My “texts” likewise need only satisfy only one person; that person is me!