@DreamSPay no attention to Dr. Hovind, he’s a fraud, he’s not earned a PhD from any where.
but that aside Nabu is correct, the retohric of harsh comments show who is truely biased. The “scientists” who fabricate long ages by selecgtively choosing answers that fit their pre-conceived ideas are guilty of poor science. There is plenty of solid evidence that the earth is less than 20,000 years old. If one could start with a clear mind [unbiased] and read the literature – he could agree that the earth does not HAVE to be 4.7 billions of years old. The evolutionists are forced to accept deep time.
@DreamSPay no attention to Dr. Hovind, he’s a fraud, he’s not earned a PhD from any where.
but that aside Nabu is correct, the retohric of harsh comments show who is truely biased. The “scientists” who fabricate long ages by selecgtively choosing answers that fit their pre-conceived ideas are guilty of poor science. There is plenty of solid evidence that the earth is less than 20,000 years old. If one could start with a clear mind [unbiased] and read the literature – he could agree that the earth does not HAVE to be 4.7 billions of years old. The evolutionists are forced to accept deep time.