Those trying to FIB-ricate some kind of false “equivalence” between alleged bias of Juan Merchan and the overt bias repeatedly demonstrated by Clarence “Uncle” Thomas, Samuel Alito and their wives, fail to grasp several relevant points:
1. Ethics laws cover perceived bias by judges or their spouses, but do not include their offspring, especially those who are adults. Children often choose a different path than their parents. I have mentioned many times that I was raised in a politically and religiously conservative background and bought the whole line all the way through my teens, until I went to a conservative religious university with a political science major, studied original source documents, and realized how much of a sham and scam the whole conservative religious and political fraud really is, ultimately transferring to the “godless state university” to finish my political science major. My late parents would be outraged to be judged as godless liberals because of the different direction I chose.
2. The spouses of both Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito have taken direct actions to demonstrate their bias in matters concerning Trump’s involvement in the crimes and traitorous domestic terrorist attempts to overthrow the government on January 6, 2021 and then their husbands have made rulings favorable to Trump in those cases. A relevant perception of obvious bias is clearly evident, and no ruling made by them in such cases should be considered valid.
3. Working for Democrats or even supporting Joe Biden is not relevant to the Stormy Daniels hush-money coverup to influence the outcome of the 2016 election. Biden was neither the presidential or vice-presidential candidate that year nor (despite complete unsupported FIB-ricated lies made up by CONVICTED FELON Dirty Don the Drowsy Dozing CON) is there the slightest hint of involvement or interference of any kind by Biden or any part of his administration.
Those trying to FIB-ricate some kind of false “equivalence” between alleged bias of Juan Merchan and the overt bias repeatedly demonstrated by Clarence “Uncle” Thomas, Samuel Alito and their wives, fail to grasp several relevant points:
1. Ethics laws cover perceived bias by judges or their spouses, but do not include their offspring, especially those who are adults. Children often choose a different path than their parents. I have mentioned many times that I was raised in a politically and religiously conservative background and bought the whole line all the way through my teens, until I went to a conservative religious university with a political science major, studied original source documents, and realized how much of a sham and scam the whole conservative religious and political fraud really is, ultimately transferring to the “godless state university” to finish my political science major. My late parents would be outraged to be judged as godless liberals because of the different direction I chose.
2. The spouses of both Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito have taken direct actions to demonstrate their bias in matters concerning Trump’s involvement in the crimes and traitorous domestic terrorist attempts to overthrow the government on January 6, 2021 and then their husbands have made rulings favorable to Trump in those cases. A relevant perception of obvious bias is clearly evident, and no ruling made by them in such cases should be considered valid.
3. Working for Democrats or even supporting Joe Biden is not relevant to the Stormy Daniels hush-money coverup to influence the outcome of the 2016 election. Biden was neither the presidential or vice-presidential candidate that year nor (despite complete unsupported FIB-ricated lies made up by CONVICTED FELON Dirty Don the Drowsy Dozing CON) is there the slightest hint of involvement or interference of any kind by Biden or any part of his administration.