I am interested in seeing how this plays out. Will her current employer run for the money by teaming with Betty’s former employer and just keeping her in the distance, stand by her by refusing to work with the old company on principle (and stating so), or try to work out a compromise that allows them to accept the project but keep Betty in the fold of it as well (if she even wants to be in the fold).
I was under the impression Betty was let go because the CEO wanted to cut overhead. (and that always means getting rid of employees). Not let go due to cause. Which should be the only reason to have that nasty clause in her termination papers. .oh, and way yes! want to see the results of this story arc!
lisajwalton about 12 years ago
BLIMEY!
QuietStorm27 about 12 years ago
Wow!
rhsasl about 12 years ago
Alex strikes again, that supercilious sanctimonious pernicious _itch!!!
ossiningaling about 12 years ago
I was just wondering what happened with the ‘former company’ story line…
XianProf about 12 years ago
I am interested in seeing how this plays out. Will her current employer run for the money by teaming with Betty’s former employer and just keeping her in the distance, stand by her by refusing to work with the old company on principle (and stating so), or try to work out a compromise that allows them to accept the project but keep Betty in the fold of it as well (if she even wants to be in the fold).
kaecispopX about 12 years ago
Beware of a pilot project with betty’s former job. Somebody is liable to be thrown out of the plane.
alc7 Premium Member about 12 years ago
Jean_1960 about 12 years ago
Betty still looks put out.
Hunter7 about 12 years ago
I was under the impression Betty was let go because the CEO wanted to cut overhead. (and that always means getting rid of employees). Not let go due to cause. Which should be the only reason to have that nasty clause in her termination papers. .oh, and way yes! want to see the results of this story arc!