B.C. by Mastroianni and Hart for March 13, 2013

Sometimes friends, sometimes enemys but usualy someone I’d like to know but never wil.My loss

Unless they were double crossers

They’ve crossed the path err, line.

They could have been cross with each other at the same time…

What? Shouldn’t this either make sense or rhyme? Both, I realize, would be asking too much …

Good thought about miscommunication and other ways of missing, but it’s doggerel as always, not poetry…and not pretty.

Is this another one of those unproven Postulates of Euclid?

cro magnon logic. object lesson in devolution. no wonder they ceased to cross any paths. may have to cross bc off my path. utterly vile.

He must be a double crosser…

And if by chance the paths should crossAnd do it with precisionThe result will surely beInjurious collision

Hey Hart!! Can you help this guy here. It’s just not the same! :-C

He said “devolution”, not “de-evolution”. Devolution does indeed exist — but, it doesn’t mean what nazzo seems to think it means.

‘’Mine’ and ‘time’ doesn’t rhyme.

You take the low road and I’ll take the high roadOur paths will meet at the Dairy Queen..Who want’s Ice Cream?

do na da go hv i…………..Cherokee-until our paths cross again. We have no word for good bye