Shoe by Gary Brookins and Susie MacNelly for October 14, 2013

  1. Missing large
    2252895  about 11 years ago

    AHHHHHHHHHHHH………

     •  Reply
  2. Opus45
    poppy1313  about 11 years ago

    The 57 Desoto is looking pretty bad

     •  Reply
  3. Opus45
    poppy1313  about 11 years ago

    Or maybe a 59

     •  Reply
  4. Large steve45
    JP Steve Premium Member about 11 years ago

    I hope that’s not a rectal dipstick!

     •  Reply
  5. Img5
    King_Shark  about 11 years ago

    @ blunebottleThat was MY line :/

     •  Reply
  6. Unkg0001
    phaze58  about 11 years ago

    He could always flip it for a profit. or he could just sell it on to atomic

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    2578275  about 11 years ago

    Remember the Studebaker Avanti c. 1965? My high school buddy called its styling bold. It was too “radical” for me but it would fit in well today.

     •  Reply
  8. Mc avatar
    flyertom  about 11 years ago

    “You might feel a little pressure”.

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    goalgo  about 11 years ago

    “58 was the first year for dual headlights in the US except for the Cadillacb brougham which was ’57

     •  Reply
  10. Pecos bill
    pathfinder  about 11 years ago

    Chrysler Corp’s answer to the Cadillac … FWIW

     •  Reply
  11. 689 6897683 blue rebel alliance logo png transparent png
    KEA  about 11 years ago

    it’s all a matter of taste. I much prefer the fins and chrome of the 50s to the Mutant Asian Insect designs of today.

     •  Reply
  12. John31
    zman111666  about 11 years ago

    The winner of the award for “the most ugly cars by one manufacturer” has got to be AMC. The Javelin, the Matador, the Gremlin, the Eagle… I sure do miss them, though. I’ll take ugly over boring any day.

     •  Reply
  13. Sany0002
    danlarios  about 11 years ago

    for all you newbes yes they made this model

     •  Reply
  14. Bill the cat
    Bill D. Kat Premium Member about 11 years ago

    Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. Those cars were works of art.

     •  Reply
  15. 038
    jppjr  about 11 years ago

    ’57’s would have only one head light…the ’58’s were the first to have two on each side.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    2578275  about 11 years ago

    @JPuzzleWhiz, Gotta tell you about the old car I saw Saturday: It was nicely painted yellow with a black top and was the same shape of a 1950 Ford only much smaller. I thought I saw, “Packard” as its factory ID in cursive. I met the owner and he said it was a Panhard, French, 1961. He popped the hood and it revealed a 2 cyl. horizontally opposed, air cooled motor mounted by its exhaust pipes. It had a 4 spd. trans with a steering column shifter with floorboard clutch and brake pedals. Also it was front wheel drive, with rack and pinion steering and independent suspension. He said his only complaints were that the rubber seals around the rear window and trunk had deteriorated, that the electric windshield wipers didn’t work and he couldn’t find out how to operate the horn or if it worked. He was its third owner and said that he could find replacement parts in France at a reasonable price. He said that about 260 were sold in the U.S. and estimated that only 20 were still being driven. I learn something new everyday and that day was a lulu.

     •  Reply
  17. Radleft
    Radical-Knight  about 11 years ago

    Damn good ’toon when you can tell the make of a car… exceptional when you can discern the model!

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Shoe