Ripley's Believe It or Not by Ripley’s Believe It or Not! for July 30, 2014

  1. B986e866 14d0 4607 bdb4 5d76d7b56ddb
    Templo S.U.D.  over 10 years ago

    So, birdy, was it the butler? (Just saying.) Also, at least Andy Capp didn’t live in the 1800s and sell off Flo to do his gambling.

     •  Reply
  2. Jack benny 02
    Kali39  over 10 years ago

    Hmm. She does the shopping and you sell her to pay off her debts. Ooo-kay…

     •  Reply
  3. Image gl2xu6o8 1679017467894 raw
    Space_cat  over 10 years ago

    Why is the surface of the sun (which is only 10k deg.) used as a reference point. Not like anyone can stand there (congress can go burn) the center is much hotter 1 million degrees, there there’s plasma which can reach 90 million easily!

     •  Reply
  4. Screenshot 163
    Cminuscomics&stories Premium Member over 10 years ago

    Scientists at Hadran particle collider in Switzerland must be off their nut! I hope we are not somehow paying for their research.

     •  Reply
  5. Fb img 1509486198333
    e.groves  over 10 years ago

    A good reason for getting into debt.

     •  Reply
  6. Ngc891 rs 580x527
    alan.gurka  over 10 years ago

    What type of thermometer can take temperatures at 10,000.000,000,000 degrees without melting or burning up?

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    greenearthman  over 10 years ago

    My understanding is that the EU is bearing most of the cost. I certainly could be wrong. And we should be paying our share. Who knows what wonderful and useful discoveries will come out of this basic research into the structure of matter, energy and time? Of course we could just keep building those Abrams tanks at $8.5 million a copy. Production is way down on those, though. Only about one every 2 days. But then since they are only guarding our desert out west just maybe that is about .5 per day more than we need! The Egyptians won’t take any more—they have more than they can use now. The Army begs congress to just stop making them, but nooooo…..Where we spend our money, says it all about us as a people.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    Mneedle  over 10 years ago

    We build military equipment that we don’t need because some some Senator has the pull to put it in an unrelated bill in order to get the cash flow in his state. Then he will say that the deficit is a tragedy.

     •  Reply
  9. 020
    prince valiant Premium Member over 10 years ago

    Regarding the Parrot: Shades of TinTin and the Broken Ear!

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    bbwoof  over 10 years ago

    1 billionth of a second? Believe it or not. I choose ‘not’.

     •  Reply
  11. Sammy on gocomics
    Say What Now‽ Premium Member over 10 years ago

    Some of the comments here seem to indicate that there is some fear that we might discover some ‘truths’ about the universe.Because of the study physics, your are now using a very powerful machine to read, and comment on, this strip.

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    fixer1967  over 10 years ago

    I believe that they did it but why?

     •  Reply
  13. Yellow submarine
    spaced man spliff  over 10 years ago

    As a scientist, I believe it can and has been done. Practical applications: that may be a while off, but one has to start somewhere. Who could foresee the engineering, technological and medical possibilities that would open up following the theoretical discoveries in physics, genetics, etc? -Look at it this way. A university researches something at a cost to the funding agencies/taxpayers, even though it’s not yet yielding any returns. After it reaches a point where it can be applied for profit the corporations grab it, mass produce something marketable, and they make money. Or, academic research lays the foundation (not profitable), then industry builds on that foundation. Not the most perfect analogy, but I hope it does shed light on the subject.-Every particle has it’s antiparticle: neutrino, antineutrino; hadron, antihadron; boson, boson’s mate and so on.

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    english.ann  over 10 years ago

    The parrot first reminded me of Girard, the parrot in Michael Crichton’s book titled, “Next.” Like our African parrots, he would initiate sentences, but he also imitated Jamie Kendall’s voice and Jamie’s kidnappers near the end of the book when Jamie’s mother came looking for him. So Jamie was rescued and Girard went home with the Kendalls, happier with them than he had been with his French owner. Sam, the parrot on Gilligan’s Island, also reacted hysterically when he heard the word, “jewel” or “jewelry,” and led the men to a box of Jewel Crackers.

     •  Reply
  15. Kiss   bw
    MetalOverCountry  about 10 years ago

    Auctioning off your wife is a more productive way to get out of debt than hiring an overpriced attorney.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Ripley's Believe It or Not