Adam@Home by Rob Harrell for February 27, 2010

  1. 442 104.ts1102651082013
    gulfcoastgrl  over 14 years ago

    Adam’s “high hopes” expression in panel four is great.

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    comYics  over 14 years ago

    nudges Adam “you can get a laptop for about $200 and hook up the wifi.

     •  Reply
  3. Native hemp co 10 678x1024
    *Hot Rod*  over 14 years ago

    Adam could start trying different passwords, who knows maybe he can get lucky, and out guess Laura.

     •  Reply
  4. Tarot
    Nighthawks Premium Member over 14 years ago

    adam is more of a porn guy , hence his master’s restrictions…..

    btw, to voluntarily not be in control of one’s own adult life is completely incomprehensible to me

     •  Reply
  5. Palms too
    pearlandpeach  over 14 years ago

    Adam does not do porn,. this IS a family strip.

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    JazminsPopPop  over 14 years ago

    I thought he was flossing in panel four?

     •  Reply
  7. Duke thumb
    -DukeNukem-  over 14 years ago

    All men look at some sort of porn pearlandpeach. All men. We also do a few other things that if we tell you don’t, we’re lying. There are different degrees of porn, starting with a catalog in the mail, progressing to things that you don’t even know exist.

     •  Reply
  8. Thrill
    fritzoid Premium Member over 14 years ago

    Duke, you’re hurting your argument by overgeneralization. If you had said “most men” or even “almost all men”, I’d have supported you. But it’s simply not true that ALL men look at porn. Some men are blind, after all…

     •  Reply
  9. Whatwouldblue
    mrslukeskywalker  over 14 years ago

    Why would she use parental controls if he was only going to innocuous sites? Parental controls are to keep kids from viewing adult content.

    Fritzoid, Lolol! They must have porn-on-tape (like books) for the blind, only verbal erotica, or, there are plenty of 900 phone numbers to solve that need. All women get are romance novels with one picture of Fabio on the cover!

     •  Reply
  10. Palms too
    pearlandpeach  over 14 years ago

    mrslukeskywalker, believe me, there is more than just Fabio on the cover books, etc. for women.

     •  Reply
  11. Thrill
    fritzoid Premium Member over 14 years ago

    Actually, mrslukeskywalker, that’s why I kept Duke’s wording of “look at” porn, rather than “utilize” it or some such.

    And there’s PLENTY of porn out there for women, too, but it’s rarely in the simple form of pictures of naked men. At the risk of my own overgeneralization, women’s fantasies require more context than men’s…

     •  Reply
  12. Whatwouldblue
    mrslukeskywalker  over 14 years ago

    I got your joke Fritzoid. I thought it was funny, especially at the end, where I also got your point, which was Duke’s point. It’s all true.

    I don’t know. I think men need the sort of stimulation they seek from such materials, whereas women either find temporary novelty in it, or never bother with it at all. I don’t know any women who rely on that kind of thing for necessary pleasure. Playgirl was always stupid to me, but I had one to annoy an overbearing boyfriend once. Even if I had it because I wanted to have it, it was something different to me than it would have been to him had it been a Playboy. That’s why women are women and men are men. Besides, I can’t say it isn’t nice when men politely admire me, so I think we’re all good being just the way we are. No complaints here.

    Fabio fantasy art is actually pretty hot. I should take a walk through the book aisle to have a look when I go to Stop & Shop next week. : )

    Adam’s wife should let him look at it if he wants to, but she probably doesn’t want him getting all worked up. They already have enough kids, including that new one. I thought it was a cat yesterday.

     •  Reply
  13. Thrill
    fritzoid Premium Member over 14 years ago

    Vive la difference!

     •  Reply
  14. Phonepic3altered4
    yyyguy  over 14 years ago

    all generalizations are inherently wrong, including this one.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Adam@Home