Adam@Home by Rob Harrell for March 09, 2010

Wouldn’t “smellavision” be better on a cooking show?

Smellavision. Boy I’ve hearing that running joke since the 1960’s! When are they even going to invent it?!

ewww! Josh, think of the decomosition smells on the crime shows! The underarms on the commerials…….oh no!!

Ji2m said, about 5 hours ago

Mars and Venus…

No, more like Venus and PONDEROSA.

And @JOSH 1360;

Have you seen the recent “sweeps week”? … ‘Nuff said!

Victoria’s Secret Fashion Shows. Woo HOO!

learn parallel parking on 3-D HDTV, Laura

If they can get the technology so 3-D TV (or movies) DON’T require glasses, that might be interesting. Comparing the introduction of 3-D in movies or television to the introduction of color and/or sound is a false comparison, because neither of those required additional paraphernalia. It’s not that the glasses give me a headache (some people do experience those from 3-D movies, but they’re working on that); I just don’t like wearing them over my prescription lenses.

And of course I sympathize with mightaswellbe’s concerns.

3-D TV without glasses is here. It’s just not commercially available yet. It’s called autostereoscopy.

I was at Harrods in London this past summer and they had such a TV on display that is manufactured by LG.

Shouldn’t that video have been billed “The Juddds”?

Mightaswellbe, I can’t see 3D either. I don’t have binocular vision. I’m farsighted with a high + astigmatism, and a different prescription for each eye. People don’t believe me when I tell them I can’t see it. They just say “No look, there it is.”, as if that’s going to make me see it.

High Def is nice though.

Adam………….you are sooooooooo right!