Doesn’t matter in any case. Since she did not actually see him steal money and he never told her in confidence that he did it, she is in a position no different from anyone else who suspects that someone committed a crime. She has no legal or ethical obligation to “rat” on him, since she has absolutely no evidence that he committed a crime. From an ethical point of view, than, she should listen to her “demon” and not call the police. No one is obligated to “rat out” anyone – either family or friends – because they “suspect” them of something. This well-meaning but completely mistaken “ethical principle” has been the tedious plot of a far too many sitcom episodes.
Rod Gonzalez almost 10 years ago
The age old battle between the Superego and the Id.
And of course, the Ego (in this case, Lil) is in the middle.
battle of plattsburgh almost 10 years ago
Unlike Lil, I have complete faith in the integrity of Chubby.
What? Me worried ? almost 10 years ago
by the Steve Miller Band ?
Jck123 almost 10 years ago
Don’t let any pesky details get in your way, like not having any facts to begin with.
2599745 almost 10 years ago
Are the Benders filling in for Scancarelli? Zzzzzzzzzzz More action to follow.
Auntie Socialist almost 10 years ago
Doesn’t matter in any case. Since she did not actually see him steal money and he never told her in confidence that he did it, she is in a position no different from anyone else who suspects that someone committed a crime. She has no legal or ethical obligation to “rat” on him, since she has absolutely no evidence that he committed a crime. From an ethical point of view, than, she should listen to her “demon” and not call the police. No one is obligated to “rat out” anyone – either family or friends – because they “suspect” them of something. This well-meaning but completely mistaken “ethical principle” has been the tedious plot of a far too many sitcom episodes.