Barney & Clyde by Gene Weingarten; Dan Weingarten & David Clark for July 31, 2010

  1. Cindy crawford shaving cream 1
    randayn  over 14 years ago

    Sounds like bum advice.

     •  Reply
  2. Exploding human fat bombs hedge 060110
    Charles Brobst Premium Member over 14 years ago

    Weā€™re Americans, we donā€™t get knighted. So drop the ā€˜Sirā€™ nonsense! We work, but we donā€™t worship those who donā€™t contribute, ie, the wealthy! Itā€™s like this: http://www.gocomics.com/thefuscobrothers

     •  Reply
  3. Text if you d like to meet him
    Yukoneric  over 14 years ago

    Thatā€™s whatā€™s wrong in the U.S. Everyone is entitled, but no one wants to workā€¦ā€¦ā€¦ā€¦.

     •  Reply
  4. Text if you d like to meet him
    Yukoneric  over 14 years ago

    except the illegalsā€¦ā€¦ā€¦ā€¦ā€¦ā€¦ā€¦.

     •  Reply
  5. Text if you d like to meet him
    Yukoneric  over 14 years ago

    May I be an illegal? Would probably earn more, thank you Mr. Bush!

     •  Reply
  6. What has been seen t1
    lewisbower  over 14 years ago

    If the Constitution doesnā€™t say a word about the right to work, do you suppose we have to earn it?

     •  Reply
  7. Avatar02
    jpozenel  over 14 years ago

    Well, he does talk to homeless bums.

     •  Reply
  8. Baby angel with roses a
    Ushindi  over 14 years ago

    Only in the comics are they wise and un-smelly, clear of eye and free of chemical assistanceā€¦

     •  Reply
  9. Thrill
    fritzoid Premium Member over 14 years ago

    ^^ Over-generalization, Ushindi. Youā€™re buying into the ā€œdemonize the poorā€ propaganda. Iā€™ve seen some who are rather fastidious, sober, and intelligent. Sometimes even all at once!

     •  Reply
  10. Baby angel with roses a
    Ushindi  over 14 years ago

    No, fritzoid, ā€œdemonize the poorā€ has absolutely nothing to do with it. Iā€™ve BEEN poor. I speak of the preponderance of the homeless Iā€™ve seen.

     •  Reply
  11. Thrill
    fritzoid Premium Member over 14 years ago

    And were you unwise and smelly, unclear of eye and assisted by chemicals? Maybe you were, but ā€œthe preponderanceā€ is not the same as ā€œonly in comics (are they otherwise)ā€. I led with ā€œover-generalizationā€ for that reason, which I see as demonization.

    Frankly, given that a substantial proportion of the homeless are mentally ill to a greater or lesser degree, ā€œfreedom from chemical assistanceā€ isnā€™t necessarily a good thing; if you can function while taking your meds, you can cease functioning quickly if you go off them, and once youā€™ve started downwards itā€™s hard to reverse. (Iā€™ve been there too, but caught it in time.) Substance abuse can lead to mental illness, but mental illness can also lead to substance abuse (ā€œself-medicationā€). Both can lead to poverty, but poverty can easily be fallen into without either, as well. (Likewise, many of the middling-to-wealthy are no more sane or chemically free than the homeless, especially considering that alcohol is the most-abused and most-destructive drug out there.) Itā€™s been said that all too many of us are no more than two (or even one) paychecks away from homelessness, and many of the homeless simply are not capable of holding down a job, and to paint them with the broadbrush of ā€œfilthy, lazy, insane and addictedā€ is to cease to see them as human beings. To accordingly write them off is to risk losing oneā€™s own humanity.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment