I still contend you have to 1. have a passing acquaintance with truth — or at least acknowledge that it exists — in order to 2. deliberately say something to the contrary of it, in order to be accused of lying. Neither of these two can qualify for that (either). Their mental processes fall under the unique category: “Fiction We Made Up That We Intend You to Take As Fact.”
Actually the Benghazi was also a lie. The evening before telling the world it was caused by a “disgusting video” she sent an email to her daughter noting the attack had al Qaeda characteristics. She knew better at the time she talked about the video. Then she repeated the story to the parents of the Benghazi deceased. She is a vile quasi-human, almost makes Trump look decent by comparison. Almost.
James MaxwellAre you talking about my mother? She spent a year getting her social security because her birth certificate was burned in a courthouse fire. Of course, you would approve, the cause of the fire was a lynch mob; a 1930s version of Make America White Again.
Quite tellingly, Zeifman made absolutely no mention of having “fired” or “terminated” Hillary Rodham, nor of telling her that he “could not recommend her for any further positions,” in his 1995 book; he only started claiming so much later. Back in 1995 he noted that Hillary had remained with the inquiry staff up until the end, leaving only when President Nixon’s August 1974 resignation made the issue of impeachment moot and the Judiciary Committee’s impeachment inquiry staff was therefore disbanded:
Darsan54 Premium Member over 8 years ago
You see, with the Dump all you have to say is “Are your lips moving?”
Oh and nice to see Winslow will probably have a job with FOX News after the campaign, but he should watch out because he’s so puuuurrty.
danielmkimmel over 8 years ago
The wingnuts can’t be dissuaded by reality but the truth is Hillary is no more a liar than most pols, and actually a lot less.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/mar/28/hillary-clinton-honest-transparency-jill-abramson
45Nasrad over 8 years ago
if Hillary were ever to tell the truth, she’s short circuit
dogday Premium Member over 8 years ago
I still contend you have to 1. have a passing acquaintance with truth — or at least acknowledge that it exists — in order to 2. deliberately say something to the contrary of it, in order to be accused of lying. Neither of these two can qualify for that (either). Their mental processes fall under the unique category: “Fiction We Made Up That We Intend You to Take As Fact.”
kaffekup over 8 years ago
False equivalency.
jbmlaw01 over 8 years ago
Actually the Benghazi was also a lie. The evening before telling the world it was caused by a “disgusting video” she sent an email to her daughter noting the attack had al Qaeda characteristics. She knew better at the time she talked about the video. Then she repeated the story to the parents of the Benghazi deceased. She is a vile quasi-human, almost makes Trump look decent by comparison. Almost.
hippogriff over 8 years ago
James MaxwellAre you talking about my mother? She spent a year getting her social security because her birth certificate was burned in a courthouse fire. Of course, you would approve, the cause of the fire was a lynch mob; a 1930s version of Make America White Again.
kaffekup over 8 years ago
Tomato Dog over 2 years ago
Wow, this is really anti biased