Herman by Jim Unger for December 30, 2018

So true, Airline should be charging extra for anyone over 200lbs if they were really concerned about extra weight for luggage. Of course the obituary offender crowd would holler at that.

It seems to me that the airlines should then refund people whose weight and luggage are below the max amount.

I assume that this was drawn before 9-11 and modern TSA’s. Today, it would take forever for this guy to get past the TSA checkpoint.

I would not give a guy that huge any argument.

That’s why the airlines make the seats smaller and smaller. They are trying to squeeze large people out of flying. My son is 6’5" the distance from his kneecap to his hip is less than the “pitch” of the seat on an airliner. He doesn’t fit in the seat and has to pay EXTRA for being too tall.

My wife usually overpacks. I usually underpack. We often wind up taking struff out of here suitcase and putting it in mine.

Can someone with a pair of X chromosomes explain to me what it is about hair dryers? To me, they are all the same (obviously I don’t use them and am about as dumb as you can get about them). I’ve never been to a hotel where they didn’t have one, yet my wife insists on packing her own.

RESOLUTION NO. 3. Ride Greyhound.

Wearing all your clothes is one way to beat the system.. bring a large bag and take off the extras once in the plane.

I don’t think we can laff at fat peoples jokes any more in USA

I guess the humour here is that a huge guy has just a small suitcase? If so, this is not one of Unger’s better strips.

Anyone who has endured sitting next to a “large” person on a plane and had the “large” person overflow into their seat, understands how unjust this is. Sorry but if your that large you should pay more and get a bigger seat in business or first class. They are selling a commodity and you should get what you pay for. Long distances take the train, they have very large seats.