Bottom Liners by Eric and Bill Teitelbaum for March 30, 2020

  1. Missing large
    hfergus Premium Member almost 5 years ago

    Non composition mentis. Not mentally competent.

     •  Reply
  2. Atheism15
    INGSOC   almost 5 years ago

    none of the above

     •  Reply
  3. Head
    unclepablo  almost 5 years ago

    My favorite was always guilty… with an explanation.

     •  Reply
  4. Picture
    AliciaCarlaSimpson  almost 5 years ago

    He has a third choice, Nolo contendere (No contest). You do not admit to the charge but choose to not contest it either. In effect it is the same as guilty.

     •  Reply
  5. Venn diagram 002
    gorillazilla  almost 5 years ago

    Members of congress are counting on immune or exempt.

     •  Reply
  6. Stinker
    cuzinron47  almost 5 years ago

    There’s always paying off the judge.

     •  Reply
  7. Calvin   hobbes   playtime in snow avatar flipped
    Andrew Sleeth  almost 5 years ago

    “No, I’ll gladly add contempt, if you like.”

     •  Reply
  8. Popeye
    adrianrune  almost 5 years ago

    Some countries, like Scotland, have “not proven”, or the “bastard verdict”, rendered when a jury isn’t convinced that a person is innocent but doesn’t believe that the case against the accused has been proven. The accused is “not guilty” under the law, but carries a social stigma.

    The some jurisdictions of the United States the “Alford Plea” is available. The Alford Plea is a guilty plea by a defendant who proclaims he is innocent of the crime he is charged with, while admitting the prosecution has enough evidence to prove he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. It is entered when an accused, with his attorney, decide to plead guilty because the evidence against him is so strong it will likely lead to conviction. It usually results in a guilty plea to a lesser crime (for example, conviction for second-degree murder instead of first-degree murder).

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment