Tom the Dancing Bug by Ruben Bolling for August 29, 2009
Transcript:
man: i'm glad you offered to meet before we actually go to court over this unfortunate situation. as you know, on june 19, our company and yours simultaneously introduced the same advertising slogan for our software products: "imagine no boundaries." woman: now, the law is silent on this unique situation. rival: are you sure about that? woman: absolutely. we researched every angle in every conceivable area of law, and no law or rule is applicable! rival: oh, i don't think you explored every area of law... allow me to introduce harvey richards, a specialist in children's law. man: children's law? what possible...? harvey: say "jinx." rival: jinx! harvey: because the companies made identical, simultaneous utterances, and my client said "jinx" first, your entire corporation now isn't allowed to say anything! man: woman: harvey: i think you'll find them very willing to negotiate. they'll just have to nod! rival: we've got 'm now, richards! you're the best! woman: ah! you used the word "the"!! the jinx is off!! harvey: how many times did we go over that, phil? man: ha! we'll see you in court! harvey: 20 seconds!! first graders hold a jinx longer than that! no more corporate work for me!
Charles Brobst Premium Member about 15 years ago
This is a true story!
Grover Premium Member about 15 years ago
Welcome back Harvey!!
Illusionzone about 15 years ago
ROFL!
Srover about 15 years ago
I never knew children’s law was so nuanced.
mrsullenbeauty about 15 years ago
Give ‘em cooties, lady lawyer!
fredbuhl about 15 years ago
This is uyndoubtedly truer than we’d like to believe. However, it does reaffirm my opinion of lawyers.
mcintyre63 about 15 years ago
What jurisdiction is this? In Mamaroneck, NY, you are released from a jinx by getting someone else to say your name three times.
StuStu2U about 15 years ago
but the lawyer said the word “the” in panel six, well before his client did! Or did that not count, since he wasn’t the jinxer?