Shoe by Gary Brookins and Susie MacNelly for August 24, 2009

A motorcycle would be cheaper to keep than a kid.

But not as much fun.

I dunno. “Harley Davidson” would be something to live up to. “Sue (fill in the blank)” would be something to live down. Given two such bad choices, I’ll take the first.

sjoujke That depends on your definition of fun. I really wouldn’t want either, but given a choice between the 2, I’d take the bike.

I harley think that’s an appropriate thing to do to a kid.

A motorcycle would have been better.

Many years ago, my nephew named his son, “Harley.” This finally explains it all.

Get on my bad motor scooter and RIDE.

How much does a kid Blue book for used low miles ?

Isn’t fun relative or was I lied too ?

Five children I wouldn’t take ah million dollars apiece for . Although I wouldn’t give one red cent for five more .

Or you can get a motorcycle & call it baby.

yes but a baby grows up, a biker never does…….LOL

I’ve had bikes (first) and I’ve had kids (second) - fun with both, but a very different kind of fun - they don’t mix well, in my opinion. He really should have gotten the bike before baby. Of course, a cartoon bird really doesn’t have free will….

Like the “HD”, if not properly tended to it’ll mark where you park it (the kid).

One of my best friend’s daughters actually had the exact same experience… Hence, my friend now has a granddaughter named Harley. Priceless…

You never have to change a baby’s oil, FishStix.