Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for May 31, 2011

  1. Comic face
    comicgos  over 13 years ago

    I know Danae is going to be a politician when she grows up!

     •  Reply
  2. Croparcs070707
    rayannina  over 13 years ago

    Or a commentator for MSNBC or Fox News.

     •  Reply
  3. Stewiebrian
    pouncingtiger  over 13 years ago

    It works for the Republicans, Lucy.

     •  Reply
  4. Deviant avatar
    Orion-13  over 13 years ago

    Rayannina and Dragonmaster77: Spot-on.Now watch the Libs line up to swear that their favorite pols just don’t do that and it’s only the OTHER guys…I like Bill Hicks’ take on it: “I think the puppet on the left speaks to my views.”…“Oh no, you’re wrong! It’s the puppet on the RIGHT who’s correct!” And beneath it all is one guy with a puppet on each arm.Orion

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    kreole  over 13 years ago

    “At the end of the day, it is what it is”.

    That’s enough right there to shut up most.

     •  Reply
  6. Cat29
    x_Tech  over 13 years ago

    Why would you want to clutter up a good argument with facts?

     •  Reply
  7. Grog poop
    GROG Premium Member over 13 years ago

    Facts don’t go away…..but they may increase in numbers.

     •  Reply
  8. What has been seen t1
    lewisbower  over 13 years ago

    Only us geeky guys joined debating club. Where do women learn to win arguments?I’m the Mom, that’s why.Because I said to.You sleeping on the couch tonight?You think you’re going where and with who?You wouldn’t mind if Mother stayed in your den?The game can wait, you’re painting the hall.If your mother cooked better, we’re eating at La Money tonightWhat is your hand doing on my side of the bed?Oh really?If you loved me————-Lucille Ball “WAH!”Face it guys, we’re out of our class Just put on your best disappointed look as you think, “I didn’t want to go to the game with the guys. I wanted to hear about her mother’s latest operation all weekend long. Methinks the fox was right.”

     •  Reply
  9. Photo on 2010 11 08 at 15.31
    aprilglaspie  over 13 years ago

    The difference between MSNBC and Fox is that Fox makes stuff up and MSNBC quotes Republics verbatim.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    rossane  over 13 years ago

    It’s the othe rway around…

     •  Reply
  11. Radicalknight avatar
    Radical_Knight  over 13 years ago

    Actually I can’t tell one party from the other. Members from either party are both corrupt, greedy, immoral and unethical. They both spend majority of their efforts trying to prove the other party inept and both are usually right.

     •  Reply
  12. Millionchimps1
    tripwire45  over 13 years ago

    Ignoring the facts. Sounds like politics or climate change.

     •  Reply
  13. 061
    pawpawbear  over 13 years ago
    dupe
     •  Reply
  14. Danae
    Wiley creator over 13 years ago

    Thanks to all of you without a life who are ironically, and cluelessly, validating the point of the satire.

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    gdshiell  over 13 years ago

    Or take my late mother’s approach… my mind’s made up, please don’t confuse me with facts.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    ilsapadu  over 13 years ago

    Ah practicing the passive aggression.

     •  Reply
  17. 11 06 126
    Varnes  over 13 years ago

    Aplilglasbie is most correct. It’s like republicans haven’t figured out that videos of what they said before, can be used to contradict what they’re saying now. They hate that! Smoke comes out of their ears…

     •  Reply
  18. 11 06 126
    Varnes  over 13 years ago

    Well, we could ignore things until they go away, or we could argue about them openly in public forums……

     •  Reply
  19. J money
    Joseph Krois  over 13 years ago

    Ouch again Wiley! Biting the hand that feeds redux?

     •  Reply
  20. Yellow pig small
    bmonk  over 13 years ago

    The Sophists had some pretty good arguments like this 2500 years back. Such as:Protagoras agreed to instruct a poor young man, Euthalos (from a working-class family) in law and rhetoric free of charge on the condition that he would pay the Sophist’s fee in full if, and only if, he won his first court case. Once Euthalos had completed his course of study with Protagoras he assiduously avoided taking any cases at all..Protagoras, finally out of patience with the young man, took him to court for payment and argued thusly: “ If I win this case, Euthalos will have to pay me what he owes me. If I do not win this case then Euthalos will still have to pay me because, under our agreement, he will then have won his first court case. Therefore, no matter what the outcome, Euthalos will have to pay me.” .Euthalos, however, contested this claim, stating, “If I win this case I will not have to pay Protagoras, as the court has declared his case invalid. If I do not win this case I still do not have to pay as I will then have not won my first court case. Therefore, no matter what, I do not have to pay.”

     •  Reply
  21. Large steve45
    JP Steve Premium Member over 13 years ago

    Euthalos in 2012!!!!

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur