Doonesbury by Garry Trudeau for August 17, 2011

  1. Img 0910
    BE THIS GUY  about 13 years ago

    He misses her more than…. the ox.

     •  Reply
  2. Croparcs070707
    rayannina  about 13 years ago

    Hey, it was a moment of weakness. And a very sexy ox.

     •  Reply
  3. Stewiebrian
    pouncingtiger  about 13 years ago

    Showing a guy book to a female editor, not a good idea.

     •  Reply
  4. Img 0910
    BE THIS GUY  about 13 years ago

    Thanks and good night.

     •  Reply
  5. Psn logo free.square triangle ex o
    DylanThomas3.14159  about 13 years ago

    Not sure what Dukester means by “guy book”. I come from the world of publishing, and in that world, a “guy book” is a book published especially for male readers. Just like a “chick flick” is a movie made mainly for female movie-goers. Does Mr. Dukester Sir mean it’s a male-only job opening? Those have been illegal in the U.S. since the well-court-tested “civil rights act of 1964” — 57 years!.Any help out there?

     •  Reply
  6. O p veteranpatch small
    randgrithr  about 13 years ago

    @DylanThomas, I think there’s a Spanish bull named Raton who’s available, but it’d be a short arc then.

     •  Reply
  7. Psn logo free.square triangle ex o
    DylanThomas3.14159  about 13 years ago

    Er, stumble, it’s a 13th century BCE Egyptian archaeological cartouche?

     •  Reply
  8. Carnac
    AKHenderson Premium Member about 13 years ago

    From last night’s thread….AKH – "“… fascism … combines elements of a protection racket … and Marxism …” – bad choice of words on my part. “Combines” implies that someone consciously took A and B and merged them together. A better word would be “shares.” Fascism has something in common with each of those institutions – the Communist desire for control over the means of production, and the racket’s rule over the business without taking actual ownership..I’m not sure what’s going through leftwingpatriot’s head with this snark: “Is that why they killed the communists and union leaders?” Well, of course – they were competition. Commies wanted to take over the entire central government too, and union bosses are in the business of controlling wage policy in their respective industries. The Reich wouldn’t take too kindly to receiving union demands.

     •  Reply
  9. Img00025
    babka Premium Member about 13 years ago

    Becka Bickle – isn’t she the gal who edited the anonymous autobiography of a Ukranian shot-putter’s romance with an unnamed President-for-Life?

     •  Reply
  10. Lady dragoncat
    Dragoncat  about 13 years ago

    Ah, you never forget your first lo- er, sexual conquest.

     •  Reply
  11. Img 0910
    BE THIS GUY  about 13 years ago

    Correction: Corpus Christi

     •  Reply
  12. Psn logo free.square triangle ex o
    DylanThomas3.14159  about 13 years ago

    LWP: When you want to correct a typo — such as from Cristi to Christi — in your own post, instead of posting a correction, you could (1) copy the text of your post, (2) delete your whole post, (3) “dump” the text content into the “Comment on this Strip” box that pops up, (4) immediately edit that content, (5) and repost the corrected text as a new comment..It works; I do so a lot. But you have to do it right away. Otherwise it will appear too far downstream for your taste.

     •  Reply
  13. Bla   version 2
    FriscoLou  about 13 years ago

    Sheeeit, Bmz… ain’t got nuttin’ on Gaddafi and his Ukrainian nurse.

    Does that mean they have to change their name to Hooters n Goobers now?

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    Spaghettus1  about 13 years ago

    Communism, in and of itself, is not evil, though many see it as such. It’s just a flawed economic system. It’s biggest flaw is the ease with which a totalitarian government can take over. Most of those are evil, mainly because benevolent people rarely win cut-throat power struggles. In other words, Stalin didn’t exactly do it the way Marx planned it; there was a lot more killing and a lot less freedom in Stalin’s version.

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    Spaghettus1  about 13 years ago

    You’re right, very different. By the old standards of right and left, they are on opposite sides. Marx was a philosopher who saw the ugly side of capitalism, and devoted his life to bettering the lot of the working man. He seemed to misunderstand human nature when it came to power and it’s ability to corrupt, but he meant well. Attlee brought socialist policies to a working democracy, where the educated, voting public would never allow a totalitarian takeover, no matter how socialist the government became. He greatly improved the health and well-being of the British populace , and the economic results were mostly positive, too.Both, in their own way, devoted much of their lives to the betterment of all mankind. That’s about as far from Hitler as you can get.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Doonesbury