New Adventures of Queen Victoria by Pab Sungenis for February 13, 2012

  1. Avatar 3
    pcolli  about 13 years ago

    Iā€™ve said this before somewhereā€¦.when they get 3D right (ie, the foreground isnā€™t thrust into my face and the background looking miles away in comparison), Iā€™ll see another 3D film.

     •  Reply
  2. Zippy56995996595959995956959599956956599569511111122222333333
    Hugh B. Hayve  about 13 years ago

    Wait until they have 3D pornā€¦..oh no, better duckā€¦ INCOMING!

     •  Reply
  3. 5f3a242a feac 42cc b507 b6590d3039f7
    Plods with ...ā„¢  about 13 years ago

    Itā€™s just a gimmick to get you to spend $10 more on the movie. If it wasnā€™t originally filmed with 3D equipment, how in h e double hockeysticks does anyone believe that this ā€˜newā€™ version is anything other than a gimmick???

     •  Reply
  4. Twitter avatar
    Pab Sungenis creator about 13 years ago

    Iā€™ve got a kickstarter campaign going to raise the money to do new print runs of ā€œSuffragettes Gone Wild!ā€ and ā€œMeet the Royalsā€ (which never really had a full print run to begin with), Lots of nifty premiums for those who pledge, including a chance to appear in the strip itself. Go to http://kck.st/xOtwSS to pledge!

     •  Reply
  5. Bc92a6de09218bcca4bb23106a180b75
    KEA  about 13 years ago

    Iā€™ll consider 3D when you donā€™t have to wear special glasses to see it. (holographic movies where are you?)

     •  Reply
  6. Monty avatar
    steverinoCT  about 13 years ago

    Kevin Drum has found clip-on 3D glasses for only $4, thereby eliminating at least one annoyance. http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2012/02/todays-shopping-tip-3d-clip-ons

     •  Reply
  7. Jack benny 02
    Kali39  about 13 years ago

    Someone must tell the powers that be that not every film needs to be in 3D (at least until you can perfect the process so you can watch the movie without stupid glasses). Theyā€™re making a 3D version of The Great Gatsby! Explain that! What is there about Gatsby that requires you to wear stupid glasses? Some things are really dumbā€¦

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    WayneZombie  about 13 years ago

    I now shun 3-D movies at all cost. And @Hugh: they have made 3-D porn. I havenā€™t seen it, but I have read about it.Probably the next and only 3-D movie that Iā€™ll see will be The Hobbit, Jackson seems to be doing a heck of a job with the 3-D engineering. But itā€™ll be 2-D again when it comes out on BluRay/DVD.

     •  Reply
  9. Aegteskab symbol
    silentbob1969  about 13 years ago

    Soon.. Gone with the Wind in 3D

     •  Reply
  10. Dscn3933
    tarzina3  about 13 years ago

    just pledged! yea!

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    Stephen Gilberg  about 13 years ago

    Bad remakes of classic movies are bad by your own definition. A 3-D re-release has the potential to be good. Some of my acquaintances donā€™t mind the ones for Disney silver age movies.

     •  Reply
  12. Jack benny 02
    Kali39  about 13 years ago

    How about 3D porn starring Power Girl? Scaryā€¦

    I saw Avatar in 3D. That was it. The 3D was pathetic even then. Oh, Iā€™m sorry, that was Avatar that was pathetic. My bad.

    And I see no reason for the Worst Star Wars Film Ever Made to be in 3D. Or Phantom Menace, for that matterā€¦

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From New Adventures of Queen Victoria