Brevity by Dan Thompson for July 15, 2012

The one on the right is really some fine print.

All those pages?! Must’ve been written by someone with a one-track mind.

The one on the right is about to be part of the story.

Looks like the reader on the left could have a literary fatality if the book slips. I’m afraid it may be more than a Freudian slip.

Book him Danno.

I hear the elephant’s book has its own trunk . . . . ☻

The section formerly known as ‘prints’.

No Picasso? Kinkade? Neiman? even Rembrandt?

CAN YOU READ IT NOW???

Imagine the weight of those words, even one could cause real damage.

Is there a “bonus” joke hidden in here, for all the books to be about animals? Otherwise I can’t think of a good reason for there not to be more of a mixture of different kinds.

I am missing something. If the books were all about animals that made large prints (like the moose), then there would be a double meaning, but since there are small animals mixed in, I am afraid I must not get it.

I guess the joke is that there are LARGE paw prints on LARGE books – regardless of the size of the animals.