Prickly City by Scott Stantis for February 27, 2020

  1. Albert einstein brain i6
    braindead Premium Member almost 5 years ago

    Here’s one, Winslow: #TraitorTrump.

    .

    Now, you’re more informed than any Trump Disciple.

     •  Reply
  2. Img 1931
    Sanspareil  almost 5 years ago

    Didn’t Winslow and Carmen work for a newspaper in Prickly City sometime back?

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    God particle  almost 5 years ago

    Nobody trumps the Trump!

     •  Reply
  4. E067 169 48
    Darsan54 Premium Member over 4 years ago

    I roll my eyes at Carmen’s disdain; what national political party and its leader dragged the phrase “Fake News” into the public lexicon?

     •  Reply
  5. Cheshirecat chandra complg 1024
    Silly Season   over 4 years ago

    Speculation that President Donald Trump might pardon Roger Stone has reached a fever pitch after Stone’s sentencing by a federal judge and the president’s repeated hints that he thinks the verdict unfair.

    But fortunately, the Constitution’s framers imagined this nightmare scenario—a suspected criminal president pardoning a co-conspirator—and they put in the Constitution language to legally prohibit the pardon power in exactly this kind of case.

    Under Article II, Section II of the Constitution, the president is given the “power to grant reprieves and pardons for offences against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.”

    But the framers knew not to place blind trust in the president to wield the power justly. That’s why they explicitly forbade a president from exercising the pardon power in “cases of impeachment.” The clause prevents the worst abuse of the pardon power: a president’s protecting cronies who have been convicted of crimes related to the president’s own wrongdoing.

    Stone was convicted on seven criminal counts centered around allegations that he had lied to Congress during his September 2017 testimony to the House Intelligence Committee as part of the Mueller investigation.

    The investigation of Stone relates to the charges that the president abused power by soliciting foreign intervention into our election and that he obstructed justice in trying to hide that “high crime and misdemeanor.”

    The best evidence that Stone is tied to those charges is his own self-described role as a protector of the president. “I will never roll on [Trump],” Stone declared in one of many statements.

    That makes him exactly the type of person Madison had envisioned while limiting the president’s pardon power.

    https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/02/27/trump-pardon-roger-stone-constitution-117757

     •  Reply
  6. 1djojn
    RobinHood  over 4 years ago

    Time to break out the Cards Against Humanity.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    Bradley Walker  over 4 years ago

    This past week I’ve read stories from the New York Times, the Washington Post and the LA Times. Online.

    It’s a real problem, how reporters will make a living when everything is online and no one will pay for content.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    William Robbins Premium Member over 4 years ago

    The big names will be fine, locals are in trouble. I have a local paper subscription even though I don’t read it much. Sort of a donation to civic accountability.

     •  Reply
  9. German typewriter detail small
    Cheapskate0  over 4 years ago

    Today’s Mike Peters (on Comics Kingdom) – very appropriate, accurate, and actually funny!

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    theotherther1  over 4 years ago

    Go to Citation Machine. They let you cite Twitter and Instagram posts for your scholarly research, as well as newspapers.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Prickly City