As for those who want protestors fired, it is simply ILLEGAL to fire somebody for exercising Constitutional rights. Therefore, those who advocate that protestors be fired, are publicly admitting that they are willing to commit crimes against the Constitution (and therefore, the country.) This would seem to be that they are admitting that they are sons of female dogs. (Trump, of course, is a son of a female—and rabid!—dog, and his father was much much worse.)
As for those who want protestors fired, it is simply ILLEGAL to fire somebody for exercising Constitutional rights. Therefore, those who advocate that protestors be fired, are publicly admitting that they are willing to commit crimes against the Constitution (and therefore, the country.) This would seem to be that they are admitting that they are sons of female dogs. (Trump, of course, is a son of a female—and rabid!—dog, and his father was much much worse.)