Back to B.C. by Johnny Hart for October 21, 2020

  1. Taz by abovetheflames
    danketaz Premium Member about 4 years ago

    And he still has to plow through it all to make sure he puts in enough spoilers.

     •  Reply
  2. Coyote
    eromlig  about 4 years ago

    Us critics also have to uphold proper grammar…

     •  Reply
  3. Gocomic avatar
    sandpiper  about 4 years ago

    The old saw: critics produce nothing but downgrade everything.

     •  Reply
  4. Wizanim
    ChessPirate  about 4 years ago

    “Well, to be fair, I didn’t read chapters 6 and 10 because of lava and Gronk footprints…”

     •  Reply
  5. Led001d
    Tentoes  about 4 years ago

    Oh, THAT’s why I write? So critics have something to complain about?

     •  Reply
  6. 06 us2c ue24
    Sailor46 USN 65-95  about 4 years ago

    Most critics lack proper credentials, which pretty much assures that they couldn’t do a better job..

     •  Reply
  7. Mountain lynx
    Shikamoo Premium Member about 4 years ago

    Use the royal “we” when you say that.

     •  Reply
  8. Rhadamanthus
    Craig Westlake  about 4 years ago

    As the Stand-up Philosopher Mel Brooks said, “First came the birth of the artist, then the afterbirth of the critic”…

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    aussie399 Premium Member about 4 years ago

    A touch of verbal anachronism here.Our friends write/chisel on rock yet a newsPAPER is mentioned.Shouldn’t it be a NEWSROOM?Still, BC is one of the best cartoons ever, one where having “classic” in the title is accurate.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    aussie399 Premium Member about 4 years ago

    Sorry. Bloody spell check.NewsROCK not newsroom

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Back to B.C.