First fact: he’s rich.
Second fact: He pays for food and shelter.
Third “fact”: Rich people can afford to pay for luxuries.
“Therefore”: Food and shelter must be “luxuries”.
(How many people do you know who use this kind of “logic”?)
First fact: he’s rich.
Second fact: He pays for food and shelter.
Third “fact”: Rich people can afford to pay for luxuries.
“Therefore”: Food and shelter must be “luxuries”.
(How many people do you know who use this kind of “logic”?)