Heart of the City by Steenz for December 28, 2009

  1. Dr strange
    Wenthral  almost 15 years ago

    Fill it with glitter Dean. Than it will be the gift that keeps giving WAY into the 2010. I pretty sure there is not a process in the world that can completly clean up spilled glitter.

     •  Reply
  2. Large tv test pattern  color
    Lyons Group, Inc.  almost 15 years ago

    Sounds like 2010 is going to be a great year!

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    Asrial  almost 15 years ago

    Heart sure got it, all right ! Maybe they could start the new decade with a kiss ? With each other !!

     •  Reply
  4. Yeenaghu
    Redkaycei  almost 15 years ago

    Yeah maybe in a year they could start the new decade… I am so sick of the media trying to force us to believe the decades run from zero to 9 like an odometer, calenders run from 1 to 10, but the change from 999 to 000 is exciting and from 000 to 001 is not so they try to change it. There was never a year zero, it is a philosophical absurdity to think they made a calender and called the second year, One…..

     •  Reply
  5. Icon   jontron
    CatComixzStudios  almost 15 years ago

    I prefer to drop shreaded cheese at my parties. That way you don’t have to worry about eatting the confetti.

     •  Reply
  6. Thrill
    fritzoid Premium Member almost 15 years ago

    Get over it, Redkaycei. People like to define decades as “the 20’s”, “the 40’s”, “the 60’s”, and so on, in the same way it’s easier (i.e. more intuitive) to think of “the 1400’s” (1400-1499) than “the 15th Century” (1401-1500). There may never have been a Year 0, but it’s equally absurd to say that the year 1980 (for example) was the last year of the 8th Decade of the 20th Century rather than the first year of the 1980’s. January 1, 2000, was the day that the year started beginning with a “2” rather than a “1”. That’s what people notice, that’s what they care about.

    Just reconcile yourself to the convenient fiction that the 1st Decade only had 9 years, the 1st Century had 99 years, the 1st Milennium had 999 years… Your blood pressure will thank you.

     •  Reply
  7. Yeenaghu
    Redkaycei  almost 15 years ago

    My blood pressure thinks you are stupid and drinking the media kool aid

     •  Reply
  8. Thrill
    fritzoid Premium Member almost 15 years ago

    It’s not a matter of kool aid, it’s a matter of nobody (with a few anal exceptions) giving a rat’s fanny that there was no Year 0. Whether you refer to the past 10 years as being a Decade or merely a decade (and any 10-year period is a decade, even if you started in 1997), they are “the Aughts” or “the 00’s” or whatever, and they began on Jan. 1, 2000. By the same token, a decade ago we looked back at “the 90’s” (which began with 1990) and a decade earlier “the 80’s” (which began in 1980).

    It’s all arbitrary, anyway. It is widely held that Dionysius Exiguus was mistaken about the year Herod died, and that Jesus was born as early as the year 6 “BC.” He may also have been born as late as 6 “AD,” the year of Quirinius’ census. How’s that for absurdity? Whether you use “Anno Domini” or “Common Era” as your terminology, the currently-used numbering wasn’t put in place until the “6th Century.” Nobody in Year 1 was aware that they were in Year 1, or would have cared. Nobody but a few monks would have known or cared whether the end of the 1st Milennium fell on Dec. 31, 999, or Dec. 31, 1000.

    Here’s another way around the issue, if you like. Imagine that the period of time between Dec. 25, 1 “BC” and Jan. 1, 1 “AD” was a week-long “Year 0.”

     •  Reply
  9. Sixshotprofile
    Decepticomic  over 3 years ago

    rerun

     •  Reply
  10. Me sarcastic never 2
    alien011  10 months ago

    A few years ago that happened to a colleague of mine. He was sick, we didn’t know why, until we found out that he had looked into a confetti cannon when it went off. Still gets mentioned in conversations every now and then.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Heart of the City