Coming Soon š At the beginning of April, youāll be
introduced to a brand-new GoComics! See more information here. Subscribers, check your
email for more details.
I think he has to indicate that he might point his gun at you before you can legally fire. However, you CAN point your gun at him and see what he does.
Since Florida was brought upā¦ In the Treyvon Martin case, remember that George Zimmerman was found innocent because he "believedā that his life was in danger. Martin never pointed a gun at him, because Martin didnāt have one. So, you donāt have to wait until a potential assailant points a gun at you before you shoot him (or her), you just have to ābelieveā that your life is danger.
ānearly all of these mass-shooting psychos have been Democrat votersā Not that this will matter to the joker who posted this, but that claim is totally bogus. Heās just repeating a lie he heard from a right-wing rant show host and repeating it without bothering to find out whether or not itās true. He needs it to be true, so why bother to learn the facts?
See http://www.examiner.com/article/the-idea-that-recent-mass-shooters-are-mostly-registered-democrats-is-a-myth Once again, reality is shown to have a liberal bias.
When Open Carry confronts Stand Your Ground, one of them ends up dead and the other feels patriotic. The supporters of both, moreover, are in agreement that the problem is that not enough people are heavily armed.
The writers of the 2nd Amendment did, in fact, state that the people were to have the right to keep and bear arms. The preceding clause is not grammatically restrictive; it just gives a reason for the main clause. However, the authors may not have intended the modern meaning; note that in the late 18th century, as demonstrated by the preamble of the Constitution and the political facts of the time, āthe peopleā meant āWhite men with a certain amount of propertyā, not āeverybodyā.
@AnarcissieNot to mention the fact that the authors of the 2nd amendment could have never in their wildest nightmares imagined the the level of carnage that a single Bushmaster can inflict. In their day, it took about 30 seconds to load one bullet.
riley05 almost 11 years ago
If Iām in Florida, and I feel threatened by the sight of an Open Carry law-abiding patriot, I can shoot him, right?
bgerard almost 11 years ago
Another epic FAIL by @libsmasher
Malcolm Hall almost 11 years ago
I think he has to indicate that he might point his gun at you before you can legally fire. However, you CAN point your gun at him and see what he does.
Lethea almost 11 years ago
Since Florida was brought upā¦ In the Treyvon Martin case, remember that George Zimmerman was found innocent because he "believedā that his life was in danger. Martin never pointed a gun at him, because Martin didnāt have one. So, you donāt have to wait until a potential assailant points a gun at you before you shoot him (or her), you just have to ābelieveā that your life is danger.
anthonydfabrizio10 almost 11 years ago
Now that you can identify the deranged killer see if you can identify the one who will stop the killer, or at least buy you some time to get away?
Lethea almost 11 years ago
- old1953In addition to the Skittles, it will help your defense it the āassailantā was wearing a hoodie.
braindead Premium Member almost 11 years ago
What if they are carrying a āDonāt Tread on meā flag? -Open carry patriot, right?
BeBadenov Premium Member almost 11 years ago
ānearly all of these mass-shooting psychos have been Democrat votersā Not that this will matter to the joker who posted this, but that claim is totally bogus. Heās just repeating a lie he heard from a right-wing rant show host and repeating it without bothering to find out whether or not itās true. He needs it to be true, so why bother to learn the facts?
See http://www.examiner.com/article/the-idea-that-recent-mass-shooters-are-mostly-registered-democrats-is-a-myth Once again, reality is shown to have a liberal bias.
DebbieLakehurst almost 11 years ago
It really is hard to tell the nuts with guns, from the gun nuts.
pksampso almost 11 years ago
When Open Carry confronts Stand Your Ground, one of them ends up dead and the other feels patriotic. The supporters of both, moreover, are in agreement that the problem is that not enough people are heavily armed.
Pjbflyn almost 11 years ago
America loves killing and an honest reading of our brief history proves it. We are an unethical nation driven by profit and fear.
Anarcissie almost 11 years ago
The writers of the 2nd Amendment did, in fact, state that the people were to have the right to keep and bear arms. The preceding clause is not grammatically restrictive; it just gives a reason for the main clause. However, the authors may not have intended the modern meaning; note that in the late 18th century, as demonstrated by the preamble of the Constitution and the political facts of the time, āthe peopleā meant āWhite men with a certain amount of propertyā, not āeverybodyā.
Lethea almost 11 years ago
@AnarcissieNot to mention the fact that the authors of the 2nd amendment could have never in their wildest nightmares imagined the the level of carnage that a single Bushmaster can inflict. In their day, it took about 30 seconds to load one bullet.