The “data” has been fudged. If you have actual proof on your side you do not need to lie! See below, in particular “HISTORICAL TEMPERATURE DATA ADJUSTMENT” ….
You need to listen to someone other than Al Gore and the Pope. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-15/research-team-slams-global-warming-data-new-report-not-reality-totally-inconsistent-
The warming period from about 1920 – 1950 has been attributed to a combination of greenhouse gases (which were increasing through the period to some extent), solar changes, and unusually low volcanic activity. Its hard to be precise on proportions, because records are limited, but all have played a role.
The flat period from about 1950 – 1970 is believed to be due to polluting particulate emissions from the proliferation of industry after WW2 with the revolution in consumer goods. This was before things were eventually cleaned up. These emissions counter acted rising CO2 levels.
The warming period from about 1970 to currently has been over 90% attributed to greenhouse gases, because solar activity has been low over this period.
It’s necessary to remember solar changes are known to have limited effects on warming maximizing out at less than half a degree. They can explain some warming early last century, but cannot explain total 20th century warming.
So while the correlation between CO2 and temperature since 1900 isn’t perfect visually looking at a graph, there are totally adequate explanations of why.
Yet the “warming period” you refer to hasn’t really happened. The GAST (Global Average Surface Temperature) has shown no significant change in the rate of increase since the 1860’s once you eliminate the data that has admittedly been fudged by NASA/Noaa?EPA……https://thsresearch.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/ef-gast-data-research-report-062717.pdf
These comments are why you never give an idiotic, unscientific opinion (like the old man’s, so we’re clear) ANY SORT of attention. Not even in a comic strip.
Global warming is just a wealth redistribution theft perpetrated on American Taxpayers. The science is not settled and there is proof of massive fraud and outright manipulation of the data to “prove” it’s existence.
perhaps there are multiple realities, and the facts in my reality are not the same as in yours. and yet, they are all valid facts. problem solved. if you don’t like it here, just change realities.
The Pro from Dover about 7 years ago
Great, you just humiliated you father. Do uou feel proud about yourself now?
Gameguy49 Premium Member about 7 years ago
The “data” has been fudged. If you have actual proof on your side you do not need to lie! See below, in particular “HISTORICAL TEMPERATURE DATA ADJUSTMENT” ….
https://thsresearch.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/ef-gast-data-research-report-062717.pdf
paul GROSS Premium Member about 7 years ago
You need to listen to someone other than Al Gore and the Pope. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-15/research-team-slams-global-warming-data-new-report-not-reality-totally-inconsistent-
RabbitDad about 7 years ago
My ignorance is as valid as your information!
Night-Gaunt49[Bozo is Boffo] about 7 years ago
The warming period from about 1920 – 1950 has been attributed to a combination of greenhouse gases (which were increasing through the period to some extent), solar changes, and unusually low volcanic activity. Its hard to be precise on proportions, because records are limited, but all have played a role.
The flat period from about 1950 – 1970 is believed to be due to polluting particulate emissions from the proliferation of industry after WW2 with the revolution in consumer goods. This was before things were eventually cleaned up. These emissions counter acted rising CO2 levels.
The warming period from about 1970 to currently has been over 90% attributed to greenhouse gases, because solar activity has been low over this period.
It’s necessary to remember solar changes are known to have limited effects on warming maximizing out at less than half a degree. They can explain some warming early last century, but cannot explain total 20th century warming.
So while the correlation between CO2 and temperature since 1900 isn’t perfect visually looking at a graph, there are totally adequate explanations of why.
Gameguy49 Premium Member about 7 years ago
Yet the “warming period” you refer to hasn’t really happened. The GAST (Global Average Surface Temperature) has shown no significant change in the rate of increase since the 1860’s once you eliminate the data that has admittedly been fudged by NASA/Noaa?EPA……https://thsresearch.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/ef-gast-data-research-report-062717.pdf
Corpse Horn Light Premium Member about 7 years ago
These comments are why you never give an idiotic, unscientific opinion (like the old man’s, so we’re clear) ANY SORT of attention. Not even in a comic strip.
Skylark about 7 years ago
I’m staying out of this one!
Allen Lewis Premium Member about 7 years ago
Global warming is just a wealth redistribution theft perpetrated on American Taxpayers. The science is not settled and there is proof of massive fraud and outright manipulation of the data to “prove” it’s existence.
Daeder about 7 years ago
So depressingly accurate. He could be a conservative Congressman.
realist666 almost 7 years ago
perhaps there are multiple realities, and the facts in my reality are not the same as in yours. and yet, they are all valid facts. problem solved. if you don’t like it here, just change realities.