Coming Soon đ At the beginning of April, youâll be
introduced to a brand-new GoComics! See more information here. Subscribers, check your
email for more details.
English once had, like distant cousin German still has, separate accusative and dative cases, used to distinguish direct and indirect objects. But as English simplified from a heavily inflected language loaded with grammatical endings for gender and numerous cases (like Latin, German, or Russian), along the way the accusative forms disappeared and the dative became the modern objective case. (Compare âhimâ and âwhomâ with German dative âihmâ and âwemâ while the English equivalents of accusative âihnâ and âwenâ disappeared.)
I just wish that the whole who/whom distinction would also have gone away. If someone asks âWho should I give this to?â, is there anyone who doesnât know what it means?
I am in favor of languages continuing to evolve toward greater simplicity, and I would love to see âwhomâ someday go the way of âthou artâ or âhe sayethâ.
Isnât english the United States speaks, sometimes considered âAmericanâ (not trying patrotric or something) because its changed considerably from âQueenâ English?
yyyguy almost 15 years ago
as someone who IS articulate, iâd rather be fun.
ksoskins almost 15 years ago
I think that this should have been dative case, but Iâm not a brachiopod.
yyyguy almost 15 years ago
whatâs a synonym for thesaurus?
zero almost 15 years ago
Pass. I once got a 54/100 on a grammar test.
Colt9033 almost 15 years ago
Iâm having trouble reading the script in panel one. Is this guys suppose to be Ben Franklin or something?
stepherb Premium Member almost 15 years ago
Thank you!!! And sorry about misreading the title â that font is brutal to read!! :-)
Plods with ...⢠almost 15 years ago
Pumetto dell Irte?
Rough translation⌠your Dellâs got a tree in it
Motivemagus almost 15 years ago
Fumetti dellâarte. Heâs been here before.
Yukoneric almost 15 years ago
jukeofurl: You receivedâŚâŚâŚâŚ
DorMaus almost 15 years ago
If you canât say it well â donât.
prrdh almost 15 years ago
âFumettoâ (comic [strip]) for âcommediaâ (comedy) in âcommedia dellâarteâ. Cute.
ChiehHsia almost 15 years ago
Dude looks like Sam Johnson, except that heâs smiling. Maybe it IS Sam Johnson, and heâs smiling because another doofus actually kicked the rock.
freeholder1 almost 15 years ago
The case for grammar.
freeholder1 almost 15 years ago
Kelsey Grammerâs case?
freeholder1 almost 15 years ago
Grammar with her suitcase?
utplagal Premium Member almost 15 years ago
Uh⌠doesnât the verb âto beâ take a predicate nominative?
freeholder1 almost 15 years ago
What is Gramper doing during all this?
The Old Wolf almost 15 years ago
In the immortal words of Calvin, âverbing weirds language.â
cwreenactor almost 15 years ago
Huzzah!!!
pschearer Premium Member almost 15 years ago
English once had, like distant cousin German still has, separate accusative and dative cases, used to distinguish direct and indirect objects. But as English simplified from a heavily inflected language loaded with grammatical endings for gender and numerous cases (like Latin, German, or Russian), along the way the accusative forms disappeared and the dative became the modern objective case. (Compare âhimâ and âwhomâ with German dative âihmâ and âwemâ while the English equivalents of accusative âihnâ and âwenâ disappeared.)
I just wish that the whole who/whom distinction would also have gone away. If someone asks âWho should I give this to?â, is there anyone who doesnât know what it means?
I am in favor of languages continuing to evolve toward greater simplicity, and I would love to see âwhomâ someday go the way of âthou artâ or âhe sayethâ.
Colt9033 almost 15 years ago
Isnât english the United States speaks, sometimes considered âAmericanâ (not trying patrotric or something) because its changed considerably from âQueenâ English?