Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal by Zach Weinersmith for February 09, 2015

  1. Idano
    Ida No  almost 10 years ago

    Since no one as any other alternatives at all, I’m all for this approach.

     •  Reply
  2. Duck1275
    Brass Orchid Premium Member almost 10 years ago

    Once we achieve control over where people are allowed to live, we will be able to do without gerrymandering. Of course, if you have to gerrymander to get one party vote district out of a majority of opposing votes, you are going to be outvoted anyway, by the surrounding districts.

     •  Reply
  3. Image
    Olddog1  almost 10 years ago

    Equal area? So one district may have 8000 people and another could have 800,000.

     •  Reply
  4. Duck1275
    Brass Orchid Premium Member almost 10 years ago

    Why else would we be advocating government sponsored low income housing?According to the New Gore Anti-automotive plan, we have to force everybody to live within walking distance of public transportation in planned urban communities.I, for one, welcome our new Luddite Overlords.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    lopaka  almost 10 years ago

    the house of no-representation will probably attempt to pass legislation outlawing thinking like that.

     •  Reply
  6. Sg county zoo 077
    loner34  almost 10 years ago

    Gerrymandering has been practiced by both parties since… well since the beginning. ;>)

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal