EEEEEEEEK! 2016 GOP
And still no front runner, unless you count Jeb Mistakes Were Made.
He’s leading in billionaires, which is what really counts among Repubicans/Fox “news” viewers.
Once Fox “news” falls in line, the viewers will follow.
Quantity versus quality?
Good one Rad-ish.
I notice that Fox “news” viewers don’t know who they want yet. Fox hasn’t told them.
They are such independent thinkers.
Oh, right. People decide who they vote for because of the debates.
That’s why candidates super PACs spend hundreds of millions of dollars on debates and not on attack ads.
’Cuz everybody knows attack ads are cheap and ineffective.
If the Debates are so Important, why is Faux telling Half the Candidates that they are Not going to be Invited to those debates?.Oh, because Faux believes that Some Candidates are more Equal than others..The ones with the Most Billionaires, perhaps?
April 12, 2017
August 08, 2017
August 01, 2017
September 22, 2017
braindead Premium Member about 9 years ago
And still no front runner, unless you count Jeb Mistakes Were Made.
He’s leading in billionaires, which is what really counts among Repubicans/Fox “news” viewers.
Once Fox “news” falls in line, the viewers will follow.
superposition about 9 years ago
Quantity versus quality?
braindead Premium Member about 9 years ago
Good one Rad-ish.
I notice that Fox “news” viewers don’t know who they want yet. Fox hasn’t told them.
They are such independent thinkers.
braindead Premium Member about 9 years ago
Oh, right. People decide who they vote for because of the debates.
That’s why candidates super PACs spend hundreds of millions of dollars on debates and not on attack ads.
’Cuz everybody knows attack ads are cheap and ineffective.
Tarredandfeathered about 9 years ago
If the Debates are so Important, why is Faux telling Half the Candidates that they are Not going to be Invited to those debates?.Oh, because Faux believes that Some Candidates are more Equal than others..The ones with the Most Billionaires, perhaps?